Posted on 01/29/2018 4:27:06 PM PST by napscoordinator
The left hates anything that shows that a baby is a human. This is because they fear the wrath of fang-tooth man-hating raging feminazis who hate little babies.
The left hates anything that shows that a baby is a human. This is because they fear the wrath of fang-tooth man-hating raging feminazis who hate little babies.
Reagan appointed “Just-us” Kennedy. One of the biggest mistakes of his life.
>
This is the 2005 Sanctity of Life Act bill sponsored by Dr. Ron Paul:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-bill/776
- Roe V Wade is immediately nullified
- SCOTUS can’t do a damn thing about it
- Federal judges can’t do a damn thing about it
- Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and the Rat party can’t do a damn thing about it
- Abortion instantaneously returns to the states, as it had prior to 1973.
>
But, but...Paul is a (L) KOOK. You can’t believe a THING that nutcase says\does.
Shame his son hasn’t re-introduced the bill...or any OTHER (R)N(C) for that matter.
Seems ‘leadership’ has no problem promoting DACA\amnesty\bills they want...so why the defeat on the 20-wk bill *Hmmmm*??
He came from Hawaii.......
Senior U.S. District Judge David Alan Ezra, who is the longest-serving
active federal judge in Hawaii, is moving to San Antonio to help with the
busy federal caseload here. He begins Jan. 2, 2013.
If I read correctly the bill also includes natural miscarriages. I think whether the remains should be buried is a decision for the parents. Depending on their personal beliefs they may be fine with the remains being disposed after being any pathology is performed. I don’t know if “fetal remains” is defined by length of gestation in the bill. But there is a great difference in a fetus miscarried at 5 weeks compared to one miscarried at 16 weeks.
There is also the who matter of laws regarding embalming and burial or cremation services. If the law requires a lined vault for burials is that going to apply for fetal remains too? All this costs families money. Again they may choose to use these services but should not be forced to.
I understand the intent of the bill. But believe it will overly burden innocent parties. A better idea would be to require death certificates for abortions performed after a certain gestation period.
The one thing this bill does not do is place an obstacle to woman getting an abortion. It in no way interferes with any so called rights.
Makes sense now. Thanks for the info.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.