Skip to comments.
‘Feminist Science’ event teaches researchers how to do ‘socially just science’
The College Fix ^
| January 24, 2018
| by WILLIAM NARDI
Posted on 01/24/2018 9:00:34 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I guess we should “mansplain” to her that science and technology aren’t the same thing.
Without science staying science, which is where modern climatology has also failed (it is a technological pursuit of SWAGs) we can’t have a technology which works.
Technology may be used for social ends, certainly. And we may debate about what ends are worth pursuing.
We can’t invent our own truth though.
2
posted on
01/24/2018 9:06:36 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The mission of the Free Radicals is to enact political and social change by advocating scientists think through the hidden assumptions in their methodological approaches and challenges researchers to think more deeply about the political implications of their work, its website states
Stuff like having a Y chromosome means you're not female?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I remember when “science” meant “the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.” I used to respect science back when it was all about learning the truth.
4
posted on
01/24/2018 9:09:57 AM PST
by
Pollster1
("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
By definition, “an open and responsible science that works toward progressive social change” is not a science.
5
posted on
01/24/2018 9:10:13 AM PST
by
WayneS
(An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
So instead of theory supported by data gathered from experimentation/observation we have this is the answer based on what the gender studies professor down the hall says it should be.
Wonderful...
6
posted on
01/24/2018 9:11:12 AM PST
by
MAexile
(Bats left, votes rights)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Lysenkoism was a political campaign against genetics and science-based agriculture conducted by Trofim Lysenko and Soviet authorities
— trunc from Wiki
7
posted on
01/24/2018 9:15:27 AM PST
by
Zuse
(I am disrupted! I am offended! I am insulted! I am outraged!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
8
posted on
01/24/2018 9:15:44 AM PST
by
EdnaMode
To: Pollster1
Science - good. Today’s SJW scientists - idiots.
9
posted on
01/24/2018 9:18:06 AM PST
by
mairdie
To: Oldeconomybuyer
by advocating scientists think through the hidden assumptions in their methodological approaches and challenges researchers to think more deeply about the political implications of their work, its website states. Translation: no scientific findings which contradict Progressive orthodoxy will be tolerated. Do not even try to question global warming, or find any genetic basis to intelligence.
10
posted on
01/24/2018 9:19:52 AM PST
by
PapaBear3625
(Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I’m not finished laughing at feminist Math, which teaches that the correct answer to a math problem is the one that makes you feel best about yourself. The Anthro Dept at UMass destroyed itself when it turned to feminist anthropology some years ago. Feminist anthro teaches that only women have made advances in anthro.
11
posted on
01/24/2018 9:23:42 AM PST
by
pabianice
(LINE)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Illustrates why the STEM sciences have been a male stronghold.
12
posted on
01/24/2018 9:24:38 AM PST
by
I want the USA back
(Doing more of what fails is the definition of liberalism and insanity.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
These idiots need to look up what free radicals are.
To: HiTech RedNeck
This is probably how the Dark Ages came about.
14
posted on
01/24/2018 9:35:11 AM PST
by
bk1000
(I stand with Trump)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Self-loathing misandrists.
No thanks.
15
posted on
01/24/2018 9:38:39 AM PST
by
Arm_Bears
(Hey, Rocky--Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I wonder how many members of university faculties and administrations in this country have heard the name Trofim Lysenko.
16
posted on
01/24/2018 9:39:55 AM PST
by
VR-21
(Does anybody know what happened to Bazooka Joe's eye?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Feminists want to keep women dumb.
17
posted on
01/24/2018 9:47:02 AM PST
by
Trillian
To: Pollster1
True. The article states the questions to be asked is for whom do we do science and why.
These days I’m afraid the answers are we do science to get grants and we do it for the ones who can pay us the biggest grants.
18
posted on
01/24/2018 9:48:13 AM PST
by
caseinpoint
(Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Because truth isnt just...
19
posted on
01/24/2018 9:52:48 AM PST
by
Crucial
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Ridiculous sign at link
Resistors are not even close to being a transformer
20
posted on
01/24/2018 10:20:44 AM PST
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson