Posted on 01/17/2018 7:50:19 PM PST by massmike
3rd
Two “husbands” here in Florida were just charged with felony child abuse against their adopted “children.” Whoever has the final sign-off on these homosexual adopters should also be charged every time there’s child abuse involved.
Homos suck!
lawsuit sends a message that "there will be consequences for acts of hate thoughts.
They received important wedding information the day before the wedding. Doesn’t everybody allow less than 24 hours to proof and o.k. material from the printer? Doesn’t a big company like Vista Print keep lots of anti-gay materials on hand? Umm.
My only question is who did they know at Vista Print to help them set up this hoax.
What amount should Hillary be sued for due to referring to a large portion of the US population as "deplorable". Is that not hateful, prejudiced and inciting violence?
“The printing company went on to say they are hoping to establish a dialogue with the couple so together they can use this incident as an opportunity to shine a light on important LGBTQ issues.
“
—
They knuckled under.
.
The root problem is “civil rights” laws used to say these various minorities have MORE rights than everyone else.
That’s how the Colorado Civil Rights Commission ruled in the same week that Masterpiece Cakes has to make the homosexual wedding cake they find blasphemous, but the homosexual business owners can refuse a Christian message requested by customers per their First Amendment rights. Utterly UNFAIR double standards, built into the law.
Then there’s Islam. The Obama DoJ said the Christians must bake the cake, provide the flowers, you’re the evil bigot. But if the Muslim doesn’t want to ring up ham as a cashier or refuses to drive the beer truck, those special little victims have the federal government defending their right to refuse per their beliefs.
Because liberals have defined civil rights to say the officially oppressed have more rights than the rest of us. What they want us to do trumps our right to refuse service.
Given that nearly all printing, from design to putting the ink on paper, is computerized, as is the shipping and billing, it should take Vistaprint only a couple of hours to figure out who screwed up, or if this is a hoax.
Well....they are faggots.
Not to mention, God hates sin.
If they accuse somebody acting through faith in Christ as hating their behavior, they might be truthful, but now they will have to answer to the higher authority for their behavior.
Had the printer failed to warn them of their impropriety, regardless their local jurisdiction, then the printer would be held partially accountable for the sins of the homosexuals by divine standards.
IMHO, the printer acted responsibly and the homosexuals need to respect the freedom of religion of the printer. If they sue the printer, then they are attacking the printer’s Constitutional rights to exercise his freedom of religion.
Additionally, failing to avoid the printer, the homosexuals also become provokers of hateful response. Such provocation is the basis for many laws on vice.
We need to find the "Drama Queen" Rights section in the Constitution.
I'll start by researching continually the 9th and 10th articles in the Bill of Rights.
Whatever gratuitous material the printing company sent is not hateful if there’s nothing distasteful left after truthful facts, statistics, and Bible passages are excepted . . .
“...they can use this incident as an opportunity to shine a light on important LGBTQ issues.”
Please don’t. My poor eyes are old and they’re the only ones I have.
Gee whez hoax leading to money.....
Vistaprint is almost entirely automated. It would be very difficult to have done this from their end. And, they get thousands of orders daily, have millions of customers. Picking out these perverts is so unlikely it is sure to be a hoax.
Me too! Call me!
I seriously doubt anyone at Vista print is enough of a “Jesus freak” to do something like this...and over half of MA is a member of the gayblt, so why bother. Uploaded files to VP should tell all.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a patently unconstitutional federal act that should be nullified by the states and struck down by the feds.
Hoax “crime” #354,253. I’d put money on it.
Maybe heterosexuals should camp out at gay bars and restaurants and see how they are treated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.