Posted on 12/28/2017 9:52:24 PM PST by bitt
Sean Hannity will be tweeting another "Tick Tock!" while we breathlessly await another sad face appearance by Nunes on his show.
“The DOJ and FBI have been withholding documents to cover up their malfeasance”
Sadly, this could be a case of “we don’t know what we don’t know”. DOJ/FBI could turn over SOME docs, but how would Nunes, et al., know if that’s everything?
Our best hope is that somehow the IG (can we even trust HIM - an Obama guy?) has everything.
Nunes, Jordan, Gowdy know what docs exist before they grill the depts in hearings: they’re lawyers. And if they don’t know, Tom Fitton does.
This is starting to look like the swamp there wants to be fired rather than accidentally incriminate their swamp bosses by forking over evidence.
It seems they hold out hope that the midterms may adjust political power back in their favor or something... hope springs eternal with these criminals.
I’m good with Nunes for POTUS someday.
Still saving the bottom row for the big rats!
Oh my goodness - another strongly worded letter?
I hope so Travis, and I love your graphic. Thanks for keeping it up to date. The web grows.....
Clapper, Brennan, Hayden and Morrel all deserve their own special row.
Ya gotta squeeze Susan Rice and Holder in there, somehow, ya know, diversity! Since Valerie Jarrett wouldn’t even take the job until Eric the Red masterminded her a way out 20yrs ago, she’ll likely skate.
A lot of the guilty will skate, no doubt.
How does the House enforce its demands?
Dog Meet Pony!!
Let me know when Speaker Ryan signs a whole Bunch of Arrest and Search Warrants and orders these quislings arrested by the Capitol Police.
Otherwise this is just part of the Big Show.
Congress has ALL the power in washington, the executive and judicial branch operate according to the whims of CONGRESS!
“U.S. CODE
TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS
CHAPTER 6—CONGRESSIONAL AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE; INVESTIGATIONS
Sec. 193. Privilege of witnesses
No witness is privileged to refuse to testify to any fact, or to produce any paper, respecting which he shall be examined by either House of Congress, or by any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or by any committee of either House, upon the ground that his testimony to such fact or his production of such paper may tend to disgrace him or otherwise render him infamous.”
Simply look up Hinds Precedents, especially chapters 53 and 51, and Cannon’s Precedents, especially chapters 184-185. You’ll find numerous detailed cases of Congress asserting its power, arresting people, holding them until they agreed to answer questions, and then releasing them. Some of these people did not refuse to appear, but simply failed to satisfactorily answer questions. One has to wonder how a previous Congress might have responded to Alberto Gonzales’s endless recitations of “I do not recall.”
Congress can Remove the President
Congress can remove the head of every executive agency Congress can remove ALL of their employees
Congress can Abolish every agency they so choose
Congress can remove EVERY JUDGE IN AMERICA, including every supreme court justice.
Congress can abolish every federal court except the supreme Court
Congress can decide which cases the Judicial Branch can hear and decide
CONGRESS can Imprison ANYONE they want for any reason they so desire for as long as they wish.
Congress can declare WAR
No other governing body has even 10% of the power CONGRESS has!!
CONGRESS IS ALLOWING ALL OF IT!!!
Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)
If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.
Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.
Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.
Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.
Some references
[1] Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html
[2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - “And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States.” http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html
[3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html 73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934) https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit
[4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html
[5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf
[6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement http://www.constitutionproject.org/documents/when-congress-comes-calling-a-primer-on-the-principles-practices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/
In 1857, a New York Times reporter refused to say which members of Congress had asked him to get them bribes (protecting his “sources” just as various Judith Millers today protect the people who feed them proven lies that costs thousands of lives), so Congress locked him up until he answered and then banned him from Congress.
In 1924 an oil executive appeared but refused to answer certain questions, so the Senate held — literally held — him in contempt. Senator Thomas Walsh of Montana argued that this question of contempt was of the gravest importance, and that it involved “the very life of the effective existence of the House of Representatives of the United States and of the Senate of the United States.” The matter was taken to court, and the witness fined and imprisoned.
Why not draw up the Contempt of Congress papers now and on January 3rd, present them to police, who arrest the lying scumbags?
Ill believe it when i see it. Dont fall for mark bradmans sundunce multidimensional chess theory. Sessions has no desire to act like a prosecutor. He should have been replaced.
Thank you, Travis, for your patience in filling out this chart. It’s curious, isn’t it, that over the last month the story is being told, one face at a time? By design? And Politico allows publication of an expose that our past President enabled Hezbollah right here on our shores? And MSM let one voice quietly utter, “something isn’t right here.” (CNN)
These congressional and agency investigations travel at slower than a snail's pace.
Why has it taken a year and a half to demand these documents?
What they hale do these people do all day long?
Not much of anything from what I can see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.