Posted on 12/18/2017 6:38:25 PM PST by Kaslin
>> so people get used to it and it starts to sound normal.
And isn’t that a shame — how easily the masses are manipulated into embracing depraved concepts and behavior.
Looks like Wilber is a Los Angeles Times reporter who’s covering the story.
HELLO AG Jeff "Moon Shine" Sessions. WTF up and start gathering some arrest documents for a Judge to sign. One would think you are colluding with these folks if you were not such a stalwart Repugnantan.
So their coverup is to admit they had people actively trying to influence a Presidential election?
Basically they have admitted to something the average person is more likely to believe, yet is still treasonous....
>
The insurance policy was not the investigation
It was seeding the intelligence community with contrived evidence of “ collusion”
then using that contrived ( planted and set up) evidence and the intel community to spy on Trump and everyone in his campaign and instigate an “ investigation” to take down the Presidency
The imsurance policy was not the investigation
It was a set up to justify an investigation
>
FR can be so verbose some times /s....We call that a (non-violent) COUP, SEDITION and TREASON.
Check your math.
BTTT
20 texts/day. (Although that’s still quite bit too, unless there were some monster days)
The Journal’s editorial board noted other troubling instances, like a now-demoted DOJ official, Bruce Ohr, meeting with the authors of the infamous and unverified Trump dossier. Oh, and his wife, Nellie, worked for the firm—Fusion GPS—that hired former MI6 operative Christopher Steele, who compiled the file, which was subsidized by the Hillary Clinton campaign. The publication added that evidence is mounting that the FBI possibly engaged in election meddling. We’ll see, but for now—the “insurance” referred to is the Russia investigation. Also, another thing the WSJ noted that former agents and prosecutors were flabbergasted that Page and Strzok were even texting each other about these cases.
Yet, let’s be honest. Even if the probe was to be an aggressive review into whether the Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia colluded, and there was—in this hypothetical—evidence of collusion, you don’t think Democrats would try to refocus this inquiry upstream to ensnare Trump? Of course they would. That’s why they’ve been obsessing about it for months. To this day, there is zero evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.
There can be no evidence since it never happened. When are they doing to get it?
They don’t need no stinking evidence.
It is the seriousness of the lies and false charges, begging for more investigation and Tax $’s.
As they emerge, shut them down, unless it is a Constitutional office...then do a major ripout and downsize.
The proof that there was a plot is Trump’s tweet that he was being “wiretapped”. That was in March. Mueller wasn’t appointed until May. Strzok said Gen Flynn lied on JANUARY 24 at a meeting set up by MCCABE.
The Flynn meeting with the Russian ambassador was late January. Yates tells Trump that Flynn lied a few days later.
So, the revealed wiretapping of Flynn’s conversation with Kislyak, was known by MCCABE, COMEY, YATES but the ambush interview was set up by MCCABE and conducted by Strzok.
Get them all to say it under oath.
...the bureau needed to aggressively investigate allegations of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, according to people familiar with his account.
You mean, to aggressively concoct the allegations.
The agent didn’t intend to suggest a secret plan to harm the candidate...
No. They just all three suddenly got interested in HAM radio.
Exactly. They wanted an insurance policy, so they got a FISA warrant and went fishing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.