Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No tax cuts for working class families? Don't let the democrats and lib media fool you.
https://freerepublic.com/senate/taxcalcs.pdf ^ | Dec 2, 2017 | by Jim Robinson

Posted on 12/02/2017 2:44:33 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Edited on 12/02/2017 2:54:27 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-148 next last
To: familyop

“Everyone pays taxes. Those who don’t pay income taxes will continue to pay sales taxes, other taxes (property taxes for many) and fees without benefiting from the sales tax deduction or property tax deduction that others take.”

This thread/subject is getting quite irrational. They don’t pay any federal tax yet you think they ought to get to deduct Sales and property tax? And get what, money back that they didn’t pay in?


81 posted on 12/02/2017 5:12:13 PM PST by CottonBall (Thank you, Julian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“The calc for a single man making $140k in CA with a $400k mortgage and paying alimony really sucks though.”

A single man with that income and that mortgage - With alimony to boot –has a lot more to worry about than this tax bill.


82 posted on 12/02/2017 5:13:49 PM PST by CottonBall (Thank you, Julian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Like I said before, I’ll take it. I also mentioned the debt of gratitude owed to Republicans with the exception of the beotch from Maine. Not one demrat voted in favor and yet, most of the attacks here on FR are against the republicans—this debt we owe to the old media empire, enemy #1 and mouthpiece for the rat party.


83 posted on 12/02/2017 5:31:04 PM PST by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Yeah, but they start out with a higher rate, so those with lower incomes don’t get that savings. And lots of those at the higher income level you suggest would have got the personal deduction AND been able to itemize up to that $12K-per level, so that $k+ personal deduction loss is a total loss.


84 posted on 12/02/2017 5:43:12 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: mistfree

Right. It also means that high tax states do not pay their fair share of federal income taxes forcing low tax states to subsidize them.


85 posted on 12/02/2017 5:45:42 PM PST by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: mistfree

Deducting State taxes means that federal taxes are indirectly funding State taxes.

Careful now, you could make a lot of enemies here with that logic.

I get into trouble by saying if you have not had a kid in public school for say 5 years, you should not have to pay someone else’s kid’s education your property taxes.

We have had big property tax increases/fees for our local community college. In 40+ years, no one on my family has used the local community college.

One last point for now. We submit our mileage to our insurance company every quarter. How about putting a gps unit in our vehicle and charge us so much per car for each road we drive on. Since our vehicles are medium size, we should pay more than people with small vehicles, but less than someone with a big suv or a truck for road maintenance.
In the meantime eliminate the gasoline taxes at the pump.

In other words if anyone uses a certain road, any service, education, or whatever, they should pay for that use not someone who doesn’t.


86 posted on 12/02/2017 5:46:06 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Build Kate's wall and keep the illegals out of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

Thank the republicans, not a single FRICKING rat party member voted in favor of it, hate them, not the gift givers.


87 posted on 12/02/2017 5:51:39 PM PST by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Thanks Jim. This will make life a lot more simple for most of us.

Our family, actually 3 different tax paying units will be able to do the post card, and we now use the same CPA. He has told us that two units can use the post card saving $300 to $400+ with his fees besides the hassle of saving the paper work. One unit will continue to do what they have done in the past with less paper work. They may pay a little more with a lot less paperwork.


88 posted on 12/02/2017 5:56:00 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Build Kate's wall and keep the illegals out of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Jim, your calculations are off. I know because I screwed up and used the Tax Foundations tables and information from earlier in the month. The part that I believe is wrong on your analysis is the child tax credit in the senate bill was increased to $2000.

As it turns out, I see an 18% tax cut under the revised senate plan. Not 12%.

Communist News Network has what appear to be the updated tables.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/02/pf/taxes/senate-tax-bill-passed/index.html


89 posted on 12/02/2017 6:01:41 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Hope and redemption are to be found in the Lord. Not in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Did you run the numbers using the latest senate assumptions? I didn’t and it turns out I save quite a bit more than I expected.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/02/pf/taxes/senate-tax-bill-passed/index.html


90 posted on 12/02/2017 6:03:55 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Hope and redemption are to be found in the Lord. Not in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: HumbleButExceedinglyAccurate

The child tax credit is $2000 per kid up till $500k income. Assuming you’re under that, you win bigly. A $2000 tax credit is much more valuable than a $4100 exemption or deduction.


91 posted on 12/02/2017 6:07:22 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Hope and redemption are to be found in the Lord. Not in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

Amen! There is making a decision re to stay in California.

Living in California isn’t a genetic defect. It is a choice.

We have lived in Californicator land since 1970.

We have family here, neighbors, we like and church members like family.

Our climate is one of the best in the world.

We live a little over an hour from great beaches, and when we skied a couple of more hours.

So, we have opted to stay here until we are carried out of our home feet first.

That is our decision, and tax payers in the other 49 states should not have to subsidize our outrageous taxes.

Morality is not unloading your tax problems on others.

No one has a gun against our head making us stay here.


92 posted on 12/02/2017 6:14:41 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Build Kate's wall and keep the illegals out of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

“Much as I hate the idea of praising congress, this tax plan is very friendly to those who live a conservative lifestyle.”

I don’t know if that was Congress’ plan but it does seem to reward those in red states. And tosses out much of the federal tax deductions based on large state taxes - thereby putting the onus on the blue states to take responsibility for their own taxes.

Not a bad plan

Yet I find it hard to believe RINOs came up with this. I wonder how much input Trump had.


93 posted on 12/02/2017 6:15:14 PM PST by CottonBall (Thank you, Julian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Appreciate the time and work on your part.

Thanks!


94 posted on 12/02/2017 6:18:01 PM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

“That is our decision, and tax payers in the other 49 states should not have to subsidize our outrageous taxes.

Morality is not unloading your tax problems on others.”

Awesome Grandpa Dave! You are a real man, taking responsibility for your choices and being honest about them. Too bad there are so few like you.

We escaped Mexifornia 2 years ago, making the alternative choice. We took big pay cuts to do so, and don’t expect anyone to help us or feel sorry for us. We’ll also take responsibility for our decisions ;)


95 posted on 12/02/2017 6:19:50 PM PST by CottonBall (Thank you, Julian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

“This tax plan greatly helps renters and those with relatively modest mortgages.”

That’s a great point I hadn’t heard yet.

Renters miss out on the mortgage deduction but this bill gives them deductions more than most ever get in a mortgage deduction.


96 posted on 12/02/2017 6:24:00 PM PST by CodeToad (CWII is coming. Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Nice.


97 posted on 12/02/2017 6:24:41 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HumbleButExceedinglyAccurate
what concerns me most about both the house and senate versions is the elimination of the personal exemptions ($4,050 x each family member). And to the degree that I have seen it mentioned, it’s been in the context of a single person or married couple.

for my family of 5 however, this increases my taxable income by $20,250.

I'm concerned about this as well, and not sure if the child tax credit will make up for the exemptions, particularly since only the first $1000 of the CTC is refundable (I don't know if this is the same with the $1600 House plan).

An E-6 in the Navy with 14 years, I make $45,018 taxable income (this doesn't include non-taxed allowances for housing and food). A Florida resident, I am the sole wage earner and my wife is currently pregnant with our 4th child.

Under the old tax plan, I claimed one exemption at the single rate on my federal withholding and received a very large tax return that I have grown quite used to. If it is no longer there, I will not be happy.

98 posted on 12/02/2017 6:37:28 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Riddle me this, Batman...why should couples earning $150k in North Dakota pay higher federal taxes than a couple earning $150k in California?


99 posted on 12/02/2017 6:49:09 PM PST by gogeo (Leftists are a parasite that destroys the host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

With a 3.25% VA loan the house was more than affordable and would have been paid in 12 years.

If it wasn’t for the cash out and alimony.


100 posted on 12/02/2017 6:54:25 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson