Posted on 11/14/2017 10:20:11 AM PST by drewh
There's that damn lie again.........
What a heaping pile of smoking manure. This gets it wrong, deliberately, in every other word. Want to mess with you head? Read this article carefully. It has so much unrelated pablum and tries to tie it all together in a sort of goulash. None of it makes any sense.
No body cares about this. This is tripe. Hillary received bribes to transfer to the colluding Russians enough uranium to kill every one in the USA and she should be charged with treason and dealt with as traditionally reserved for traitors.
There probably were no “hacks”, at least not for what WikiLeaks has released. Passwords were fished, and data was leaked from an internal source who is probably now deceased. “Hack” is used to scare baby boomers who are easily confused by all this newfangled 25 year old emails and interwebs technology.
The Clinton campaign mentioned WikiLeaks nearly a thousand times.
I recall Trump rejected WL’s offer of help.
and Sessions was backpedaling on the special prosecutor for Uranium One today, I turned the TV off!
Jeez, I’m on the “TO” address list of hundreds of emails each day. For many, and possibly most, I look at the title/sender/maybe 1st paragraph...AND THEN DELETE THEM. If someone asked me about one of those emails a year later, I would not really recall them.
Hopefully, Hope Hicks and others dealing with the corrupt/vindictive Mueller and his gestapo agents will remember the words “I don’t remember”, “to the best of my recollection”, etc. EMULATE HILLARY CLINTON!
Lots of conclusion jumping with no proof again.
Since when is Wikileaks a “Russian-Linked site” ?
Trump has also expressed many unkind words about Assange.
with the MSM everything is ‘Russian linked’
“...hacked emails stolen from Democratic National Committee servers by Russian agents.”
Truth: Emails provided by Seth Rich to Julian Assange providing valuable information about the corruption within the Clinton Campaign and the DNC.
Since the MSM is only too willing to spout the same nonsense as Hillary.
Not Guilty.
And why would Wikileaks offer a $20K reward for info into the death of some DNC hack if they didn't have a special connection to him.......
Really, Dawg! Go peddle this crap to Cobol2Java.
Who was that other girl who worked on the campaign that was possibly having an affair with another staffer? Also not guity.
The Clinton campaign mentioned WikiLeaks nearly a thousand times.
I recall Trump rejected WL’s offer of help.
When is her campaign going to be scrutinized for that and MUCH more???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.