Turley: Clinton Allegations ‘More Recognizable As a Criminal Allegation’ Than Allegations Against...

Breitbart Video ^ | 10/26/17 | Ian Hanchett

[markomalley]

video at link

Full headline: Turley: Clinton Allegations ‘More Recognizable As a Criminal Allegation’ Than Allegations Against Trump

[Zenjitsuman]

LOCK HER UP, DO YOUR JOB JEFF SESSIONS.

[Flag_This]

"...and possibly could be criminal."

They took a national strategic asset and sold it for their personal gain. Reminds me of Teapot Dome.

[mazda77]

The only reason he slipped the word possibly is that he has not seen the evidence or testimony yet.

[nickedknack]

Held my nose and watched the 7am half hour of NBC Today show. The subjects:

Korea
JFK files
Opiods
Harvey Weinstein
Rescue at sea
Weather

Of course, no mention of the Clintons and Uranium One or ‘RAT-Russia collusion.

[jonrick46]

On Fox, Gregg Jarrett listed the laws broken to Hannity:

Laws broken in the Uranium One Scandal:

18 U.S.C. 201B: Federal Bribery Statute
18 U.S.C. 201C: Federal Gratuity Statute
18 U.S.C. 1341: Mail Fraud Statute
18 U.S.C. 1343: Wire Fraud Statute
18 U.S.C. 666: Program Bribery Statute
18 U.S.C. 1952: Travel Act
18 U.S.C. 1961-1968: Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act

Laws broken in the Dossier scandal:

52 U.S.C. 30101 Et Seq.: Federal Election Campaign Act Filing A False Or Misleading Campaign Report

52 U.S.C. 30121: Federal Election Campaign Prohibits Foreign Nationals and Governments in U.S. Campaigns

[nickedknack]

Second half hour of Today show: Still no mention of Clintons, Uranium One, or Russia dossier. Guess they don’t exist.

/s

[LouisianaJoanof Arc]

Bookmark. Thanks!

[Liz]

..... "could be criminal"..... Clintons took a national strategic asset and sold it for their personal gain. Reminds me of Teapot Dome.....

Good start....but Turley (or somebody) needs to address the Clinton criminality in this context.

More egregiously (to me) is that the criminal Clintons used proprietary information----intel the govt uses to secure the safety and security of we, the people.....to carry out their criminal acts.

I consider it reprehensible that Secy Hillary routinely sent her itinerary to the Clinton Foundation, giving the Clintons govt info to plot their scams.

[markomalley]

I'm shocked.

[Robert A Cook PE]

If a scandal falls in the forest on a democrat, and the newsprint fail to bleed, lead, or read about it, does it exist in the rest of the ABCNNBCBS media?

[LS]

As I keep arguing, we are long past the day when the fake news drivebys matter. Trump has broken them.

Yes, they still have viewers/readers. But they do NOT speak to the “vast middle,” who now take what they have to say with a grain of salt.

Moreover, because of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc., news “bleeds” into ordinary people through all sorts of other venues.

So, yes. The Scandal will be heard.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Your predictions have been accurate; my pessimism? Not so much. Thank you.

[VRWC For Truth]

Lock them up ....and throw away key ...

[itsahoot]

The $500,000 given to Bill Clinton might have been innocent.

There is never anything innocent about half a million dollars for a speech.

[GOPJ]

Much of Washington DC was redesigned to service white liberal elites and their pet projects... NOT the people of the country.

[GOPJ]

Much of Washington DC was redesigned to service white liberal elites and their pet projects... NOT the people of the country.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks markomalley.

[GOPJ]

Thanks for the ping.

[SunkenCiv]

My pleasure.