Posted on 10/19/2017 7:43:26 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Not to worry, President Ninth Circuit will restore them.
If he lives in Philadelphia I can pretty much assure you he was NOT a Trump voter. And he’s likely middle class only because he’s sucking off of some government job.
Gotta love the way the MSM finds people who have problems with everything President Trump does. But they are hard pressed to find enthusiastic supporters.
Whether or not they will hurt is irrelevant.
Whether something will hurt is not a litmus test for determining if it is the right thing to do. Surgery hurts. Chemo hurts.
Etc.
Everybody wants their free stuff.
I remember the conservative woman on NPR that said she was still voting for Trump even after the “Grab ‘em by the...” remark. The reporter asked her how she could still vote for him. The woman said, “I’m voting for a president, not a husband.”
Life hurts (sometimes)...
“Some middle-class Americans worry Trump health subsidies cut will hurt”
But most know that it will help them by reducing the outrageous cost of their worthless Obamacare healthcare plans.
Not only was this the right thing to do, to do otherwise is ILLEGAL. Spending money from the government till without legislation and the funds to do it with is a crime.
As a matter of fact, President Ninth Circuit will certify the Iran Agreement, decide not to build the wall, set the federal budget and a whole host of other things. President Ninth Circuit is really a busy dude/dudette.
Not only was this the right thing to do, to do otherwise is ILLEGAL. Spending money from the government till without legislation and the funds to do it with is a crime.
WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?!
NOW Reuters is concerned with the middle class? Give me a break.
Trump voter Stephen Lewis, 62, lost his job as a veterinarian in Wisconsin
________
I live in WI. I know veterinarians. Where in WI does he practice? If he was employed by a large practice, why did he lose the position at 62 with all those years of experience? Why doesn’t he go into private practice? The 2 vets I know both have very different private practices. Another is an owner of a large group practice. There are opportunities at all levels, small and large animal, for example.
While the unconstitutional nature of the subsidies is certainly a reasonable consideration, it does not change the fundamental fact. You are a racist, homophobic, anti-muslim bigot. So there!
Well said.
I like that....President NINTH CIRCUIT...how true! We shall see.
***that his premiums, now $309 a month, could rise further with the subsidy cut,***
I’m retired, got a great insurance plan from my former company, and I’m paying more than that, And I’m happy with it!
When some people pay and some people dont have to pay lacks basic fairness. There is no constitutional to have me pay for your insurance premiums or for your vacation or beer. That is classic communism. We do have emergency room care if you really need it but to get insurance subsidized when i am paying that premium is bull crap.
And they call this "unbiased journalism"??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.