1 posted on
10/15/2017 6:54:52 PM PDT by
leaymane
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: leaymane
34 posted on
10/15/2017 7:36:53 PM PDT by
proust
(Since a politician never believes what he says, he is quite surprised to be taken at his word.)
To: leaymane
Bullshit
(and welcome to FR anyway ;-)
35 posted on
10/15/2017 7:42:05 PM PDT by
tomkat
To: Blue Jays
"...Trump supporters open to bump stock bans..."
Incorrect. We do not support any slippery-slope bans.
36 posted on
10/15/2017 7:42:22 PM PDT by
Blue Jays
( Rock hard ~ Ride free)
To: leaymane
Didn't anyone else see that a belt loop works just as good as a bump stock? Also a rubber band wrapped behind the trigger and fastened to the magazine does the same thing. I've found videos with a wooden dowel fastened to a wooden board at a ninety degree angle and held against the trigger will bump fire the rifle. I've found with a quick Google search that some guns with a practiced trigger pull can go into a bump fire mode with nothing but a trigger movement timed with the normal recoil.
This bump stock witch hunt cannot end well. The fact is the Second Amendment isn't to be negotiated.
37 posted on
10/15/2017 7:42:39 PM PDT by
higgmeister
( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
To: leaymane
I added ‘banglist’ to the keywords. You should have.
And, no, I do not support banning bumpstocks and the bill Congress is considering goes far beyond that.
40 posted on
10/15/2017 8:13:45 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
To: leaymane
NO,I AM NOT!
But keep up the talk about bans, Demonrats... one day we will have had ENOUGH. Civil war comes ever closer!
43 posted on
10/15/2017 8:22:44 PM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(Trump won; we got Gorsuch and a bit of the MAGA agenda. But now the Swamp is back in control.)
To: leaymane
As if it would make any difference. Someone want it bad enough will find a way to get one.
46 posted on
10/15/2017 8:25:30 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: leaymane
47 posted on
10/15/2017 8:27:37 PM PDT by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west))
To: leaymane
Here’s the BATF letter.
http://www.gunslot.com/pictures/batf-letter-about-slidefire-stock
The response of Trump voters should be, “Ban `bump-stocks’?
Don’t be silly. These are gun parts, not firearms. And Obama’s BATF gave Slide Fire a thumbs up, citing the rationale that it helped shooters with mobility problems.
So instead let’s talk about lifting the onerous regulations on suppressors for shooters trying to save their hearing. Then we’ll talk about national carry reciprocity and also repeal of some stupid laws banning machine guns.”
You never show weakness to gun grabbers. And welcome to FR.
52 posted on
10/15/2017 8:41:17 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
To: leaymane
😡🐂💩. Yeah cause that will end all murders, suicides, accidental discharges, domestic violence and stop the heartbreak of psoriasis. Which by the way I have. Fidiots!
54 posted on
10/15/2017 8:48:22 PM PDT by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: leaymane
I’m open to trading a bump stock ban for national concealed carry reciprocity. I’m not open to anything else.
55 posted on
10/15/2017 9:01:27 PM PDT by
RC one
(The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
To: leaymane
This one’s not. The 2A means what it says.
To: leaymane
Nope. Just checked. We are not on board with any gun grabbing laws of any sort. Not now not ever.
57 posted on
10/15/2017 9:48:17 PM PDT by
Boomer
(The dem party has become the North Korea of American politics; unreasonable, dictatorial, fascist.)
fta... “bump stock” devices that effectively turn semi-automatic firearms into fully automatic weapons, ...
***********************************
More fake news. The weapons are still semi-auto.
Why don’t so-called journalists ever do research before showing what idiots they are?
59 posted on
10/15/2017 11:15:48 PM PDT by
octex
To: leaymane
Every Tom, Dick and Harry
would
be Up in Arms!
62 posted on
10/16/2017 6:31:25 AM PDT by
Big Red Badger
(UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
To: leaymane
No we don’t. Try again...
63 posted on
10/16/2017 7:06:28 AM PDT by
Envisioning
(Carry safe, always carry, everyday, everywhere.)
To: leaymane
How about this little gizmo?
Bottom line is someone wants to cause mass destruction, they will always find the means.
67 posted on
10/16/2017 7:36:54 AM PDT by
CodeJockey
(Trump... The exorcist of Cultural Marxism)
To: leaymane
So you have posted 4 articles including this one but never responded to anyone? Really?
69 posted on
10/16/2017 8:14:12 AM PDT by
Envisioning
(Carry safe, always carry, everyday, everywhere.)
To: leaymane
Some of my cohorts seem to think such a ban would placate the gun grabbers. Hand them a small victory they can use at re-election time, as if that’s all they want and they’ll go away.
I disagree and believe it would embolden them, like chumming the waters for sharks.
71 posted on
10/16/2017 9:34:55 AM PDT by
newgeezer
(It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson