Posted on 09/06/2017 5:45:03 AM PDT by SJackson
I know what you mean, but that wasn’t really the point I was making.
We KNOW Jews aren’t partaking of that kind of thing, arguing this logical point with people who would even think this in the first place is completely pointless.
Sorry. That was 1841, not 1941. Must have been confused by the Baghdad Pogrom of 1942.
1841? correct? Not really familiar with that. Thanks.
In 1841, the Jooos! of Damascus were accused of taking a Catholic priest’s assistant and sacrificing him, and then using his blood to make matza. The entire Middle East exploded, and there were pogroms everywhere. So a few years ago, an Egyptian televisiion station ran a miniseries, treating the libel as historical fact, showing the rabbi in Damascus distributing vials of blood to his congregants, etc. It featured Omar Sharif. Egypt is one of the more modern states. Omar Sharif is an international star, and one of Babs’ ex-hubbies. So the pali supermom is not really crazy. The society she lives in is, and she’s just taking Omar Sharif and her kids’ schoolbook texts at face value. Jooos! drink blood, is her logical conclusion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.