Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Houston flood: 'No way to prevent' chemical plant blast or fire
BBC ^ | 30 August 2017 9:00pm | BBC Staff

Posted on 08/30/2017 9:21:04 PM PDT by blueplum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: TexasGator

You know how to google as well as I do. Basically it was “nothing to see here” and “you’re crazy if you are concerned at all” and decades later documentation surfaced indicating melted fuel. Then there are the accounts of residents that are...hard to account for (rusty blood red water from rain, metallic taste, medical effects on people living in the area which match symptoms of radiation exposure) but the gov “owns” the measurement instruments for radiation so all reported effects on residents are ignored and or denied.

Then there’s the routine off gassing permitted all nuke plants, denials from nuke industry that radiation is unhealthy etc. even though nations occasionally report cancer clusters around nuke plants, like this report from Germany.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2757021/


41 posted on 09/02/2017 12:29:32 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Interesting link ....

KiKK ... Who the heck are they? Did you bother to research possible bias?

Note in your link reviewing the KiKK ....

“Unfortunately, the KiKK authors have refused to release the data for each of the 16 nuclear power stations for further analyses.)”

BIG RED FLAG when you can’t review the data!

The KiKK study is garbage. Totally debunked by later studies.


42 posted on 09/02/2017 5:50:53 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Nuke industry is totally debunked. They have nothing in terms of credibility at this point.

Unfortunately, we’re never going to agree re nuke industry and there’s so much more going on in the world right now that we probably can agree on - I’m going to focus my attention elsewhere.


43 posted on 09/02/2017 9:53:58 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

we both agree that you are ranting without bases ...


44 posted on 09/02/2017 10:18:40 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Games? You play games like that? Typical nuke apologist wherein my saying “The Emperor Has No Clothes” is equated with ranting. It’s sad but the nuke industry betrayed us all. With their documented history, they can’t have respect.


45 posted on 09/03/2017 12:27:07 AM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“With their documented history”

which you can’t provide ...


46 posted on 09/03/2017 6:24:30 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson