State police ID troopers killed in helicopter crash near Charlottesville
Posted on 08/14/2017 12:32:05 AM PDT by Kaslin
Premise not proved at this point. Stopped reading there.
He is just getting his info from the BSM. They purposefully inflated the body count.
“The intentional vehicular murder of protesters...”
Mr. Davis apparently thinks more than one protestor was “murdered” in Charlottesville.
I didn’t know that. Thank you.
Exactly.. That ticked me off! FoxNews once again showed themselves to be as bad as the Marxist Media.
Yeah. I am done with Fox. Over it.
More evidence: https://imgur.com/a/d3sFx#734YblC
Davis clearly declared the driving incident a "murder" and even claimed multiple protesters died, the latter of which is objectively not true.
Davis and you did not inform yourselves of the issue before posting!
Of this there can be no doubt.
False flag, trying to stir up/ create/ provoke some r w opposition.
We should...
1. do our dd and expose the charlatans, and their motives and their m.o. and...
2. plan ahead to de-escalate whenever and where ever they appear next.
The Media should be labeled a domestic terrorist group.. They purposely gin up racial conflict and violence with their agenda driven “reporting”.
State police ID troopers killed in helicopter crash near Charlottesville
It’s funny that people are using ear pepper spray on people. The kind that you use for people is way stronger. Bear pepper spray is so weak as to be useless against a grizzly bear and lack bears usually don’t bother people so they never need it. But if you need protection against bears use the stuff cops use on people.
Mind you I'm taking the "bear pepper spray" thing from people who were getting sprayed. If bear pepper spray really is that weak, maybe it was regular pepper spray, or they added something to it, and so people assume it must be for an animal. There is at least one fellow in hospital with possible permanent blindness.
IF this were true then the rest would follow. BUT...
“intentional” This has not been proven. It would be difficult to prove, or even know, unless one had telepathic abilities, and could go back and read the driver's mind at the moment of the incident.
“vehicular murder” Implies a reading of prior intent, which is lacking at the present.
“protestors” As far as I know, only one person was killed.
“motivated by supremist hate” Again, the assumption that the writer knows the driver's thoughts and feelings, which in fact he/she has no way of doing.
This sentence is a prime example of the behavioral/affective twisted thinking of ‘mind-reading’, the assumption that one knows and understands the thoughts and feelings, usually negative, of another, without evidence.
Accepting it as the premise for what follows is a logical fallacy. Let us not fall into the reasoning errors of our enemies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.