Skip to comments.
Pentagon says North Korea ICBM is new, not-seen-before missile
washingtonexaminer.com ^
| 7/5/17
| Jamie McIntyre
Posted on 07/05/2017 3:44:23 PM PDT by ColdOne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
1
posted on
07/05/2017 3:44:23 PM PDT
by
ColdOne
To: ColdOne
2
posted on
07/05/2017 3:47:11 PM PDT
by
Regulator
To: Regulator
Destroy the next missile the Norks s be up. Calmly state that if another ballistic missile is launched not only will the US shoot the missile down, but they will launch their own missile.
3
posted on
07/05/2017 3:49:04 PM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
("“In America, we don’t worship government, we worship God.”" DJT)
To: ColdOne
Did it say, “Made In Iran” on it?
4
posted on
07/05/2017 3:51:02 PM PDT
by
ChicagahAl
(Stay safe out there. The Haters (TM) are dangerous. Very dangerous.)
To: ColdOne
...a first-of-its-kind missile that the U.S. had not seen before ...
Why? It’s not like something you can pickup at Walmart. I would hope our intelligence services are better than that.
5
posted on
07/05/2017 3:51:57 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(#CNNBlackmail)
To: ColdOne
It’s funny the corner that the Nork dictator has put himself into here.
See, if North Korea has an ICBM and they threaten to use it then the US can justify attacking North Korea.
But let’s say the North only CLAIMS to have an ICBM but this President wants to end their threat before they get a real one...all he has to do is confirm that the North has an ICBM and then...checkmate.
Because they may not really have an ICBM. We’re just calling their bluff.
6
posted on
07/05/2017 3:52:42 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
To: EQAndyBuzz
Destroy the next missile the Norks... See, the problem with that is; if it hits, they know our capabilities. If it misses, they know our limitations.
Better to just watch and discern THEIR capabilities and limitations. I'm sure our best Intel minds are analyzing (and planning) as we speak (or type).
7
posted on
07/05/2017 3:53:40 PM PDT
by
ChicagahAl
(Stay safe out there. The Haters (TM) are dangerous. Very dangerous.)
To: ChicagahAl
8
posted on
07/05/2017 3:58:23 PM PDT
by
ColdOne
((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever! “Laughing my #Ossoff)
To: McGruff
I know....it is very troubling if they had never seen one like this, very troubling.
9
posted on
07/05/2017 3:59:19 PM PDT
by
ColdOne
((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever! “Laughing my #Ossoff)
To: MeganC
They had one, they just fired it off on the 4th. It landed near Japan.
10
posted on
07/05/2017 4:01:47 PM PDT
by
ColdOne
((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever! “Laughing my #Ossoff)
To: ColdOne
If it landed near Japan then it’s not an ICBM.
11
posted on
07/05/2017 4:02:41 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
To: ColdOne
a first-of-its-kind missile that the U.S. had not seen before and represented a dangerous escalation
Why don’t they just ask Senators McCain and Schumer or Barry Soetero what the new capabilities of the missiles are they helped North Korea get.??
12
posted on
07/05/2017 4:02:59 PM PDT
by
eyeamok
(Idle hands are the Devil's workshop)
To: MeganC
It has been confirmed to be.
13
posted on
07/05/2017 4:08:56 PM PDT
by
MarMema
To: MeganC
In fact it can hit Alaska.
14
posted on
07/05/2017 4:10:11 PM PDT
by
MarMema
To: MeganC
If you can throw a football fifty yards down field, how far will it go if you throw it nearly straight up?
15
posted on
07/05/2017 4:14:06 PM PDT
by
null and void
(This is how socialists work: Erase the past, Bankrupt the present, Steal from the future.)
To: ColdOne
Hmmmm ..?? Wasn’t there a report in the last few days that Russia was siding with North Korea ..?? Or .. am I thinking of something else ..??
16
posted on
07/05/2017 4:14:41 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
("Peace Through Strength")
To: MarMema
Two stage. Pretty brazen shooting it off. Trajectory was almost straight up. If it had gone off course it could have landed almost anywhere in that region.
Funny if it landed in Chicom territory.
17
posted on
07/05/2017 4:15:13 PM PDT
by
CodeJockey
(I don't have a license to kill, but I do have a learners permit.)
To: MarMema
Read what you said and then read my post again.
Sorry, but just because someone and then someone else calls it an ICBM does not necessarily make it so.
It landed near Japan. Just like most every other North Korean missile.
I’ll call it an ICBM when it splashes down off of Washington, Oregon, or California.
18
posted on
07/05/2017 4:16:20 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
To: ColdOne
I grew up reading and hearing about the deeds of America's glorious past, but at a time when all that seemed to have ended. During my entire life--with the possible exception of the
Mayaguez incdient--America has been dumped on and humiliated and defeated, with nothing compared to our record before I was born (hope it's not all my fault).
If Trump really wants to show he's a break from our recent history of getting shoved around, he will act as our ancestors did when they were threatened.
19
posted on
07/05/2017 4:18:35 PM PDT
by
Zionist Conspirator
(Viriycho sogeret umesuggeret mipnei Benei Yisra'el; 'ein yotze' ve'ein ba'.)
To: null and void
The Nazi V-2 rockets could easily reach orbital altitudes but they could not orbit and they could not cross an ocean.
Going straight up is proof of going straight up and nothing more.
20
posted on
07/05/2017 4:20:36 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson