[rktman]

Dear nita lowey of NY. You can't figure it out? Not surprised. A lot of us call this WINNING! We should not severely cut our contributions, we should eliminate them all together. No doubt that would cause Princess Grey Beaver to take some extra tokes on her peace pipe.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

YAY!

[Go Gordon]

“Frankly I cannot understand how this administration intends to influence the UN agenda, help those most in need, and advance UN reform if it disengages and severely cuts our contributions,” Lowey said.

I'll tell you how, Nitwit Lowey: Power of the purse string. Just an off the top of my head example: If country X needs new water treatment facilities, instead of the US giving the thieves at the UN big bucks, go directly to Country X and make a deal where US companies build the plant.

[Joe Boucher]

The U.N. with its 50+ mooselimb countries regularly vote in block against American and of course Isreali interests.
Oh, hell yeah.
Let’s keep giving money to this?
Maybe NOT!

[JudgemAll]

How about we just quit the UN. You cannot control a hellish teen by grounding it here and there.

[fungoking]

Rep. Nita Lowey, “Frankly I cannot understand how this administration intends to influence the UN agenda...”

Does anyone have the time to list all the things Lowey doesn’t understand?

[okie 54]

Is there anything wrong with expecting the rest of the members of the UN to pay a fair share? Considering the USA pays the lion share only to have everyone vote against us on nearly everything. Absolutely no value for the money spent