Posted on 04/28/2017 9:36:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
“The Libs will get some hand-picked judge from somewhere to tell the fed how and where to spend the money. Judges have really stepped up the illegal and unconstitutional legislating-from-the-bench lately.”
The lawless ‘judicial branch’ is the real threat to liberty and the conservice cause, and has been since it became atavist after FDR stacked the bench.
Our only long term solution to this problem is a reembarrassing of the 3 branch system and restricting the judicial branch to cases of law before them.
Doing that is going to be difficult and require a great deal of political will. We must show the judges acting like dictators and refusing to go along with them and their lawless demands as patriotic and democratic. On the grounds of the separation of powers.
In practice we must acknowledge their power to decide guilt in individual cases of law. But not their power to issue broad edict as to extend beyond that case.
The Federal court does not dictate the law, only the guilt in a individual case of law. This basic constitutional printable must be restored if we are to have the rule of law rather than the rule of uncollected men in black robes.
No wall, no government.
Yeah but if it shuts down, like Ann Coulter says: “schoolchildren couldn’t visit national parks and welfare checks won’t get mailed on time” lol
RE: schoolchildren couldn’t visit national parks and welfare checks won’t get mailed on time”
That is, if we have a President Obama.
I’m simply asking you about the definition of a word.
Your inability to answer a direct question is telling.
That might be a legitimate definition in the real world (private sector) but sager is right.
In the District of Corruption, during a “shutdown” they call it a furlough, they don’t go to “work” and then they get paid.
What else would you expect from union-thug bureaucRATs?
How?
Words mean things. That definition comes directly from OPM.
...but sagar is right...
Not based on his initial ranting comment.
In the District of Corruption, during a “shutdown” they call it a furlough, they don’t go to “work” and then they get paid.
So, you are saying that shutdown = furlough?
If so, look at sagar's rant: "Shut it down. ANd make sure there is no furlough"
So...
Aren’t you a little obsessed with the tree bark, forgetting about the damn forest. Go dig up Webster for the word “bark”... let’s discuss what it “really” means.
79
I’m being gracious.
Not to the RATs....and the drive-by RATagandists. They violate the language on a daily basis.
So, you are saying that shutdown = furlough?
No, THEY are saying it. They said it before, when Clinton shut down the government. (which he did) In fact he told the union-thug bureaucRATs not to worry, they would get their back pay for the time missed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.