Skip to comments.
Order blocking executive order re sanctuary cities
Northern District CA website ^
| 04/25/2017
| William Orrick
Posted on 04/25/2017 1:42:28 PM PDT by TheConservator
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: All
I thought Congress was the be all on spending and obligating funds. If Congress doesn’t obligate funds to specific cities they don’t get funds.
Not sure how a judge can change that.
21
posted on
04/25/2017 3:30:37 PM PDT
by
John Milner
(Marching for Peace is like breathing for food.)
To: John Milner
I thought Congress was the be all on spending and obligating funds. If Congress doesn’t obligate funds to specific cities they don’t get funds. Not sure how a judge can change that.These funds were appropriated by Congress. Trump is threatening to cut off funding which Congress appropriated, hence the judge's ruling.
To: Lurking Libertarian
“Trump is threatening to cut off funding which Congress appropriated, hence the judge’s ruling. “
No, that’s the judge’s ‘strawman’ for his PR stunt.
The ‘case or controversey’ is strictly imaginary.
23
posted on
04/25/2017 4:33:41 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: TheConservator
Best recourse for now is to sic Sessions on those who run the sanctuary cities and prosecute them.
24
posted on
04/26/2017 2:26:37 AM PDT
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson