We are going to terrify the enemy.
1 posted on
04/19/2017 12:12:03 AM PDT by
Robwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Robwin
Would be nice if Trump said IXNAY.
2 posted on
04/19/2017 12:18:13 AM PDT by
JohnnyP
(Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
To: Robwin
3 posted on
04/19/2017 12:18:59 AM PDT by
chris37
(Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
To: Robwin
Are they painting them pink?
4 posted on
04/19/2017 12:19:26 AM PDT by
kalee
To: Robwin
Wimyninthemilitary, too fdup.
5 posted on
04/19/2017 12:20:16 AM PDT by
A strike
(Madison Avenue is so racist.)
To: Robwin
6 posted on
04/19/2017 12:20:37 AM PDT by
Az Joe
(Gloria in excelsis Deo)
To: Robwin
Will the subs cut through the water with grace and poise?
7 posted on
04/19/2017 12:26:25 AM PDT by
Jyotishi
(Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
To: Robwin
Will they also put a nursery on board?
8 posted on
04/19/2017 12:30:34 AM PDT by
teacherwoes
(Indoctrination is often done under the shadow of a gun)
To: Robwin
They should do this, while they’re at it. Change fire control for missiles in each submarine to only require one woman sailor, and make it a simple button.
9 posted on
04/19/2017 12:32:41 AM PDT by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
To: Robwin
How about a tampon launch tube? Huh? Great idea right there. Little ones aft. Could simulate torpedo launches.
FIRE TAMP 1 !!!!
FIRE TAMP 2 !!!!
12 posted on
04/19/2017 12:59:44 AM PDT by
eartick
(Been to the line in the sand and liked it, but ready to go again)
To: Robwin
Women and seamen don’t mix.
To: Robwin
To: Robwin
To: Robwin
I guess this will keep the folks in New London busy for a while.
To: Robwin
As regulation creep sets and teams up with the new military PC policies, men on subs and even ships will become an anachronism ...
22 posted on
04/19/2017 2:45:04 AM PDT by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: Robwin
About 80 female officers and roughly 50 enlisted women are now serving on subs...What's wrong with that ratio? I've always said that the push to get women into combat was more about the push for careers for female officers. Female sailors being evacuated from a submarine deployment for pregnancy is just collateral damage and not to be spoken of.
23 posted on
04/19/2017 3:23:36 AM PDT by
Tallguy
To: Robwin
24 posted on
04/19/2017 3:34:35 AM PDT by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: Robwin
Australia, Canada, Sweden, and Spain are four countries that already allow women to serve on submarines, and I think their submarines are more cramped than ours are.
To: Robwin
The designers are doing the obvious things, such as adding more doors and washrooms to create separate sleeping and bathing areas for men and women and to give them more privacy.Privacy? I guess we aren't going with Target rules.
28 posted on
04/19/2017 4:36:35 AM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
(Kill: TWITTER, FACEBOOK, CNN, ESPN, NFL, NPR)
To: Robwin
This is f-ing ridiculous.
29 posted on
04/19/2017 4:36:45 AM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Robwin
Redefining “hot racking.”
34 posted on
04/19/2017 4:40:05 AM PDT by
Flag_This
(Liberals are locusts.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson