Posted on 04/02/2017 5:00:49 AM PDT by Olog-hai
I am also of two minds about this
Those who refuse to learn from history are condemned to repeat it
When you sup with the Devil you should bring a long spoon.
Dallying with evil to understand it is a bad idea for most people. Evil cannot be prevented by understanding.
I do not know your religious bent but the Catholic faith has martyrs who refused to denounce their G*d in the face of death & torture. To speak for genocide is not that far from denouncing G*d in my mind.
The understanding to be obtained from the Inquisition or Hitler’s reign is that there are evil people in the world and that by contamination and in fear weak people will stand with the evil ones. The lesson is that one stands against evil wherever one finds it and cherishes & nourishes good because otherwise truly horrible things happen. Good men must join together to resist evil and learn to recognize it by it’s quest of power for the self and the disregard for the rights & value of the others that are being trampled.
Evil is a possibility in each of us; it is a part of being human. Embrace it for whatever purpose at your peril.
A stopped clock. Kalifornia students woke up for a brief moment.
I agree with the students. Imagine if these students decide to run for office in 15 years. Some lib would dig up these essays and destroy them.
What’s next? Asking our young to ‘empathize’ with serial killers?
Fire the ‘teacher’ ...
Isn't that the norm with Bolshekrats?
“So why not argue against the 13th Amendment or the 19th, then? “
They do. Education requires understanding points of view. Obviously, there were people that were against such 13th and 19th protections so it had to be passed to provide them.
Studying those points of view is not the same as adopting nor supporting them.
This is why college isn’t for everyone. Some people are just too stupid to teach.
Next they can argue in favor of the child sex slave trade.
On the one hand, it is very useful to understand how a certain group of people may be systematically dehumanized to the point where outright murder is no longer anathema, because it could happen to others: white males on the very same campuses, perhaps? "Whiteness" is, after all, as inescapable and indelible as "Jewness" used to be if one is to believe the neo-Aryan racial theories of the current crop of Social Justice Warriors.
On the other hand, the student incapable of producing such a paper due to profound moral convictions is a failure. One who produces a brilliant apologia is a success (with, as others pointed out, his or her name on the paper). I'm not sure that's a wise position for a teacher to place a student into, even if the intention is honorable.
Studying points of view is not the same as being forced to debate from that point of view, in essence selling it.
Some people obviously know little and understand less about understanding people & points of view as they relate to mass insanity.
I realize the teacher wants them to understand our enemies like Sun Tzu, puts them in a situation where they have to ration do I obey orders or risk being shot? What sort of morals did these people in the top nazi brass have ETC.
But for a University assignment, this is just going too far.
NEXT UP: An Assignment as a Democratic party senator to vote for euthanasia and eugenics
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.