Posted on 01/27/2017 1:24:30 AM PST by Eleutheria5
I remember that as well. Her words are liberally sprinkled with lots of “Uh”s and “Ummm”s. It was most annoying to listen to her speak. My takeaway is she is not very bright at all, and doesn’t have the “it” factor.
IMO, they are really scraping the bottom of the barrel here. But you never know, with the Crazy party.
Someone put a bug in her ear, after her brother died and she has 1/2 heartedly been chasing, or being PUSHED into politics since then.
Trump is the first NYer to win the White House since FDR; Yankees don’t tend to do well nationally because their issues aren’t really the same as those of importance to much of the rest of the country. That is why they are out of touch with “flyover country”.
As for IL, there may simply not have been a spot a Dem candidate or incumbent wanted to give up.
I’ve got you beat. I’m changing my last name to Kennedy!
And Southern presidents have done so well? LOL
You need to rethink what you posted....it's just ridiculous and dumb.
George Washington disagrees...
OTOH, there has been, in just recent history, LBJ,Carter, and Clinton. Talk you way out of that one and I’ll start going back father, in history.
The 12 years of Texans (Bush I & II), while not perfect, were preferable to the alternatives.
That has worked for Barbara Boxer and Patty Murray for many decades. To be elected a Democrat Senator from NY or the left coast it seems to actually be an asset, which says something about the dem voters in those states.
Get someone who can see, help you reply to posts.
I did; they provided 12 years of “Southern” presidents that were preferable to the alternatives.
You are in great need of remedial factual history and geography lessons.
This past election saw a NYer (Trump) run against a former NY senator (a carpetbagger from IL); NY would have claimed the winner either way. How many NYers won in the country as it exists now (50 states)?
The vast majority of presidents won the election and served PRIOR to 1959!
Mixing apples and cement in no way to try to win an argument.
Am I to assume you believe NY is a reflection of this country’s values (whatever they may be)? Which of these two recent candidates had “NY values” (Hillary or Trump)?
Can you lend me $20?
Excellent.
Putz is only 66. How did he become a major league clymer is such a short period of time?
Facts matter and all YOU have are emotions and irrational leapings from one topic to another, when faced with the FACT that you post hysterical twaddle.
Were LBJ and Slick Willie's "values" the ones WE need to all be in awe of?
How about the Virginian transplant to N.J., where YOU are from, who was an anti-Semite, anti-black, anti-Catholic, and who loved and praised the KKK? And just in case you are as uneducated as your post imply, I'm talking about that POS Woody Wilson.
Trump has GREAT values; that double carpetbagger, from suburban Chicago, has the "values" of a FABIAN, at best, though more akin to the MARXIST she is.
I only carry pounds sterling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.