Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Trump's 4% GDP Will Remain Elusive: It's Not His fault, it is simply a function of math
Zero hedge ^ | 01/03/2016 | Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com

Posted on 01/03/2017 2:26:29 PM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 01/03/2017 2:26:29 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Simply a function of math.”? I see, like the unemployment rate below 5%.


2 posted on 01/03/2017 2:29:40 PM PST by mosaicwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So there you have it, folks: there’s never been a better time to buy gold. Which is why I’m selling it.


3 posted on 01/03/2017 2:30:58 PM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Let’s start with the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and their projections...”


4 posted on 01/03/2017 2:33:33 PM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Real potential GDP

When I started out as an accountant, I thought up an account name that sounded impressive and would confuse people. "Prepaid Accrued Cash". Many intellectual discussions around staff lunch tables with that one. And now we have "Real Potential GDP".

And much of this article talks about one expense (interest expense, cost of money) as being the primary reason that economic growth / revenue (GDP) can't grow. Very interesting, similar to adding Social Security Numbers together and looking for a meaning or purpose.

5 posted on 01/03/2017 2:35:34 PM PST by Bernard (The Road To Hell Is Not Paved With Good Results)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Author is an idiot!

He thinks to have $1 of growth in the economy takes $3 of government debt. It’s not the debt that drives growth. The debt reflects that government has been spending more than it takes in. And that is reflective of poor economic results.

He ain’t listened to anything Trump has said. Instead he is looking solely at trends of our current incompetency and assuming more of the same.

Trump will soon have both the economy growing and debt shrinking. Then this idiot author will then assume that in order to grow the economy you have to shrink debt.


6 posted on 01/03/2017 2:36:50 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Nice article. Hey! Did you know NYC is ungovernable? And nationally milease is the rule. Yep. Because Democrats can’t fix any of these things no one can...


7 posted on 01/03/2017 2:37:36 PM PST by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Get rid of the restraining departments and strangling regulations and return them to what they were in, say, 1969, and the economy will explode in growth.

(Oh, this needs to be done at all levels of government, not just the federal level. The states and counties have “fee’d” and regulated their companies into a low maintenance level with near zero growth.)


8 posted on 01/03/2017 2:38:11 PM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

I agee with you 100%

I would not be shocked to see 6% growth in time. But, Trump needs to get his tax agenda passed and the complete repeal of all the federal government regulations and obamacare.


9 posted on 01/03/2017 2:40:06 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh gee, another “Trump will fail” article!


10 posted on 01/03/2017 2:41:26 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Under Trump, so many rules and regs will change that ANY prediction based on the current environment is useless.


11 posted on 01/03/2017 2:44:21 PM PST by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz

Deregulation is great but that is not enough. It will take some pretty high tariffs to convince these globalist chimps that the cheap labor party is over. Make it here or pay up.


12 posted on 01/03/2017 2:45:11 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

meh

When tax rates for corporations go to 15% and off shore funds are brought homethen we will see


13 posted on 01/03/2017 2:45:18 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

More tariffs and less income taxes. That’s the ticket.


14 posted on 01/03/2017 2:46:23 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“More tariffs and less income taxes. “

We actually don’t need tariffs, which would precipitate a trade war. Nobody wins a trade war. What we need is less regulation and paperwork. I own six pieces of rental property. It takes four man-weeks to get ready for taxes. (Oh, and as a landlord it is illegal for me to do my own repairs or put on my own roof. Thus, the costs of those things is prohibitively high.)


15 posted on 01/03/2017 2:49:55 PM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mosaicwolf

Like the election math did not add up either. That is until Trump won.


16 posted on 01/03/2017 2:51:28 PM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

People that comment import tariffs would start a trade war are really not worth reading. They are either duplicitous or stupid, or both. WE ARE IN A TRADE WAR NOW. Been in one for 30 years. Only we don’t fight back because of Free Traitors™..


17 posted on 01/03/2017 2:57:46 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I cant disagree with much of that either.

The founders felt the best way to make commerce REGULAR with foriegn nations was through tarrifs.

Yet there are those even on this stie that claim that that was not to regulate commerce, but was to fund the federal government only.

I am against UNREGULATED FREE trade. I am for FAIR and FREE trade. You send me 1 dollars worth of goods and I get to send you 1 dollars worth of goods.

China taxes the hell out of stuff coming into their country from ours. That, and they play with their funny money. Tax the livin piss out of their crap comming into our country or they dont get to send it in here.


18 posted on 01/03/2017 2:57:56 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Projections = Dice


19 posted on 01/03/2017 2:58:02 PM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz

There is no Constitutional right to free trade with foreign countries. None what so ever. Actually the opposite is true.


20 posted on 01/03/2017 3:00:17 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson