Posted on 11/22/2016 6:10:59 AM PST by artichokegrower
Hope your happy. Now you’ve screwed up the thread.
while it is true that any date that is not guarded can be gotten through there are secondary measures that make a gate secure. you mentioned one but that’s not the only one.
If the state owns the land of the river to some point inland then there maybe enough
land to build the wall without having to expropriate land. But if the land owners along the
river owns to the actual USA border then land will have to be taken for building the wall.
Does anyone the ROW river boundaries, etc?
“Well, begging your pardon, but theyre NIMBY idiots, just like Kennedys advocating windmills but not wanting them off Marthas Vineyard to spoil their view.”
The windmills were not going to be on private property.
The windmills didn’t involve imminent domain such as other are suggesting.
The windmills didn’t have an impact on peoples ability to support their families by cutting of an important resource that they paid for.
THERE! YOU JUST DID IT! And like George Costanza’s work on the Guggenheim Museum addition, “It didn’t take that long, either...”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.