Posted on 10/30/2016 4:55:00 AM PDT by Lewis Stone
Hand on the codes, or the trigger. Yes. It should be nutty, drunken,sick Hillary!
I believe the American people think one is an alcoholic only if he self-confesses.
She is a vile women.
Without any doubt the most evil and greedy person to ever seek the Presidency.
That she is so close to achieving that is a shocking indictment of America in 2016.
No, that is the alcoholic community that thinks that. The rest of America is plenty willing to call anyone an alcoholic whether they are or not. Or, a racist, homophobe, etc.
Having said that, I would put Clinton more in the drug addict bin. Just like Trump said. Drug test her.
I have a friend who is an alcoholic. He is brilliant, but the alcohol use is catching up with him. He is 56.
Hillary is 69. It makes sense that it is catching up with her.
So was Churchill.
Plenty of reasons not to want Hillary or any Clintons in office without digging for this.
Just out of curiosity, is alcoholism a reason to deny a security clearance? Anyone know?
She’s probably using downers and alcohol. It would explain some of her falls. People think they can handle both; they can’t.
THAT is one disturbing picture!!!
You’re not comparing a genius like Churchill (wit, historian, victor of WWII) to Hillary Clinton are you? FDR liked his booze as well but he was miles ahead of this incompetent corrupt monster.
If someone’s ok was gored......so be it.
‘Confession’ is a word abhorred by Hillary.
Email ID 20412 in the Podesta group.
Combine this with former secret service agent Gary Byrnes’ book revealing her hair trigger temper.
Bill has even received a black eye from being on the receiving end of a lamp.
We need the steady sober hands of Donald Trump asap!!!
But Lurker, one doesn’t have to dig very far. You’d best get another left-wing candidate.
Yes.
Back in my day, Yes. Alcoholism, or drunkeness, was cause to deny, or even revoke, a security clearance. The logic was twofold.
First, alcoholism carried with it the high probability of financial distress, either from the actual drinking, or from the outcomes of the drinking. Financial distress was an open invitation to compromise.
Second, there was an assumption that, if you couldn’t remember where you’ve been, then there was high probability that you had been compromised, usually morally.
Now, granted, this was during the height of the Cold War, but...
Compare with Donald Trump, who never touches the stuff because he recognizes the potential for abuse in someone of his personality type. (Said so himself.)
Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.