Posted on 10/24/2016 10:47:02 PM PDT by Anti-Hillary
Politico Questions on the Clinton Crime Foundation sent to John Podesra:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21802
the graveyards are full of people who fell in disfavor with the Clintons - motivation enough to get out of dodge.
I doubt Braverman would run or speak out any corruption on Hillary or anything brave like that being he’s recently done this: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/29/fashion/weddings/neil-brown-eric-braverman.html
Even if false, this may make the Clintons concerned enough to eliminate yet another person who knows secrets.
Thank you!
I will look for email later, but Podesta (in email with Mills) definitively named Eric Braverman as being the source of a leak.
Now he is being spoken of as “the man who can take the Clintons down.”
See post #48, and here’s an update on the email chain from today’s release.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/31703
Re: Tweet from @JoeNBC
From:john.podesta@gmail.com To: ntanden@americanprogress.org Date: 2015-03-08 22:31 Subject:
Re: Tweet from @JoeNBC
No could be doug or ira.
On Mar 8, 2015 8:25 PM, “Neera Tanden” ntanden@americanprogress.org wrote:
Is he really that long serving? described as long serving aide at the
foundation
That’s it! :-)
re: post 48.
I am slow today, LMAO!!!!
Well, duh...that will teach me not to reply without pulling up the thread....
IF somebody is gonna “take the Clintons down”; I say,
“Pee, or get off the pot”.
OK thanks for your replies... but what has he done that would make him fearful and seek asylum abroad? If he stayed loyal to the Clintons he has nothing to fear. Is he the source of some leaks? Did he take a hoard of documents with him when he left? Has he been trying to blackmail anyone, or does he have documents he is using for leverage in some way?
I am thinking this story may be just smoke. If he has reason to be afraid it means he has done something to raise their ire. What could that be?
Has this been verified true or false?
I have no idea. I am thinking it’s a fake story due to the source, dubious provenance, and lack of confirmation/follow-up. Also, I still don’t quite know what this guy is accused of doing to warrant running to Putin’s arms? But I am always open to new information.
The recent wikileaks had an email where Podesta said Braverman was a mole.
I guess he doesn’t want to wind up like Scalia or Rich - if it’s all true. It was on Gateway Pundit so who knows.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.