Judicial Watch Releases New Hillary Clinton Email Answers Given under Oath

JudicialWatch.com ^ | 10/13/16 | JudicailWatch

[blueyon]

Hillary either "Did not recall" or "objects to the Interrogatories " to every question asked.............slick, deceitful and obstruction are a few words that come to my mind. Voters need to know this is nothing compared to what we will see if (God forbid) she wins.............VOTE TRUMP

[blueyon]

Thank you Judicial Watch for trying to honestly get answer

[Mark]

Maybe: “I was at home baking cookies for my daughter.”

[Nifster]

Lying liars lie

[Fractal Trader]

I cannot recall....I cannot recall....I cannot recall....I cannot recall....I cannot recall....I cannot recall....

[GreyFriar]

The old “Try to remember” parody song that Rush Limbaugh played during the original clinton years is now being done in reality and under oath.

Here is the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZbf4WxHkcI

[DIRTYSECRET]

Hillary and Comey under oath. Different conclusions. The only way out is for Obama to pardon both of them. Special investigation maybe but special prosecutor no.

[GreyFriar]

But does bh0 pardon them before or after Nov 8?

[justlurking]

Thanks for posting this.

This is a refreshing change from pointless vanities, mis-represented emails, click-bait blog pimping, and nutjob conspiracy threads.

[blueyon]

LOL I remember that

[blueyon]

It is getting tiring to hear “Bombshell” and then nothing isn’t it

[GreyFriar]

And if Hillary has so many gaps in her memory, is she medically capable of being president? It appears that her mind and ability to remember anything not on a teleprompter is failing quite rapidly.

[17th Miss Regt]

Maybe: “I was at home baking cookies for my daughter.”

Well, it certainly wasn't: “I was at home baking cookies for Bill's son.”

[kevao]

It is getting tiring to hear “Bombshell” and then nothing isn’t it

That and "Breaking!!!"

[justlurking]

It is getting tiring to hear “Bombshell” and then nothing isn’t it

Most of these aren't "Bombshells". They are just flat wrong.

No, Hillary didn't use an American pejorative for blacks.

No, Hillary didn't "destroy" Muslims.

No, Hillary's campaign didn't conspire to commit murder.

No, Trump's latest accuser doesn't have the same phone number as the Clinton Foundation.

No, Podesta didn't withhold emails from the State Dept.

I could go on and on. I don't know why I care, but I'm trying to my part to keep FR from turning into a cesspool of nutjobs.

[upchuck]

Killary, or rather her lawyers, answered these questions in the manner expected: deny, delay, obfuscate.

Nothing new here. Nothing expected either.

Elect Trump/Pence! Put an end to the Clinton Crime Machine.

[tiki]

And some people think she has Parkinson’s disease. It’s obvious she has Alzheimer’s.

[stylin19a]

- she throws Powell under the bus again.

- she invokes attorney-client privilege , yet that privilege only binds her attorney. Also, an exception to privilege is made, when the client speaks in presence of individuals who were neither attorney nor client, or was disclosed to such individuals.

If any statement by Abedin; Kennedy; Pagliano or Bentel shows they were present when Hillary made privilege statements, then she should be hosed there.

most of all the rest are the Sgt. Schultz defense.

she does have a curious too specific answer:
Response: "Secretary Clinton does not recall requesting a State Department-issued Blackberry or a State Department e-mail account in or around August 2011."

maybe it was in june or maybe it was in september? we know she had a spit load of blackberrys

[Joe Boucher]

hey, F.B.I.,
You guys are horse shit.
least that is what your boss shows.