Posted on 09/01/2016 7:17:15 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
So much for the idea that college is a place of free expression, exploring varying ideas and concepts, and expanding one’s knowledge or horizons. Unless you buy into global warming, forget about it??? Really?????
I’m so old, I remember when “Institutions of Higher Learning” welcomed diverse opinions.
Seems reasonable considering the whole course is based on the assumption it’s a fact, and is simply considering the possible impacts of that warming were it to be true.
So students are not there to learn but to be indoctrinated. Galileo comes to mind. These are not objective teachers, but useful whores and idiots.
98% of climate scientists agree that global warming in man made. Wow I haven’t seen those numbers since USSR elections. As Stalin said it isn’t who votes, its who counts the votes.
If you aren’t a sceptic you aren’t a scientist.
Follow-up story: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/1/university-official-wants-answers-whether-climate-/
>> “is based on the scientific premise”
A scientific premise?
they demand access to colleges and universities they disagree with. demand their’sides’be’heard and given validation.
they refuse’to do the same to those they disagree with.
indoctrination, not learning.
No more. They are now strictly about indoctrination.
>>“The point of departure for this course is based on the scientific premise that human induced climate change is valid and occurring,”
The point of departure from reality.
Open-mindedness vill not be tolerated at my indoctrination classes. Verstehen sie?
I think Saddam Hussein used to get 99% of the vote in his elections. And I think the various Kims who have run North Korea generally have gotten between 99% and 100% of the vote...........
To me this would be the same as course studying “what if” the world was flat.
The fact that the world isn’t flat isn’t the point. The point is to brainstorm the “what if” if it were, not to debate the point of if the world truly is flat or not.
“The point of departure for this course is based on the scientific premise that human induced climate change is valid and occurring,” said the professors. “We will not, at any time, debate the science of climate change, nor will the ‘other side’ of the climate change debate be taught or discussed in this course.”
Pure conjecture based on fiction isn’t scientific fact...
Shouldn't that over in either philosophy or a scifi literature course in the literature depts?
Three professors to teach a class????
They might fail pseudo-science.
jacobins
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.