Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Which Candidate Is Better For Your Bottom Line: Trump Or Clinton?
The DailyCaller ^ | August 8, 2016 | Robert Donachie

Posted on 08/08/2016 6:41:47 AM PDT by bobsunshine

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: gogeo

“It’s like arguing over which level on the Titanic you’ll occupy.”

I’d have preferred to occupy a life boat....


21 posted on 08/08/2016 7:25:09 AM PDT by sevinufnine (A moderately bad man knows he is not very good. A thoroughly bad man thinks he's alright. C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

What’s the point of analyzing Hillary’s “Proposal”? This lady lies more than she tells the truth.

We really have no idea what she will do, or had bad she will be for America, if elected.


22 posted on 08/08/2016 7:42:54 AM PDT by proudpapa (Trump 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Yes, the politics of envy as opposed to examining what it is that has kept one from achieving success which more often in life is a succession of bad choices augmented by some kind of addiction.


23 posted on 08/08/2016 7:53:10 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

“Clinton’s plan is carefully tailored to affect pretty much only households making over $250,000 in income.”

If a government systematically targets a group of people for any reason it makes them eligible for refugee protection under international law.

They might apply to say Switzerland or Singapore for asylum from Democratic tax persecution.


24 posted on 08/08/2016 8:02:50 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

I have proposed an scofflaw immigration amnesty in exchange for a package of Constitutional amendments on taxation, judicial power, benefit funding.

Here are some taxation limitations I propose:

1. a. for any person or entity (within any jurisdiction), 8% on total state (and local) income taxation
b. 8% total maximum on excise, occupancy, sales and use taxes of all types, except 100% maximums on telecom services and devices, motor fuel, sweeteners, food with over 12% fat and/or oil and/or over 2% added sugars by weight and alcoholic/containerized beverages and no maximums on tobacco or drugs, with existing federal excise taxation priority
c. no new government payment/purchase/provision mandate, federal tax or impost, excluding import duties
d. financial impositions on and related to privately owned real property (and its rental, repair, renovation and transfer) may only be made under state and local law and they shall be limited to:
A. annual real property tax on a residential building and its curtilage of up to:
1. $2 per square foot of any finished/cooled/heated/plumbed open plan area on the first floor or higher, plus
2. $150 if the open plan area includes a food preparation counter or cooking unit, plus
3. $300 per finished/cooled/heated/plumbed room not in a taxed open plan area
a. halved for half-baths, laundry rooms, attic/basement/over garage rooms not legal for bedroom use and
b. $0 on foyers, atriums, hallways, stairwells, closets, pantries, lanais, porches, and vehicular garages not legal for bedroom use
plus the following optional surcharge percentages
1. up to 15% to build/maintain public roads in the levying jurisdiction
2. up to 2% to provide free library service within 10 miles of the property
3. up to 2% to build/maintain public parks
4. up to 20%, if required by statewide law
less, in any tax year, 6% of the impact fees collected on the property in the prior twenty years
B. an annual tax of a percentage of up to 1.5% set by state law of market value on other real property
C. recording fees of up to $50/instrument, but no more than $100/transfer in total
D. impact fees of up to an absolute total of $6,000/housing unit and $2/square foot of enclosed non-residential space
E. total other construction related fees of up to $1 per square foot for a new building or on an existing building $30 plus $20 for each of the following trades involved: roofing, electrical, plumbing

Real estate tax caps alone might switch New York, New Jersey and Connecticut into our camp.

I know 95%+ of you are opposed to an immigration amnesty, but it is inevitable because most leading politicians of both parties want it - cheap labor for Republicans and surefire votes for Democrats.

I’ll trade the inevitable amnesty for permanent Constitutional tax/fee/fine&penalty caps.


25 posted on 08/08/2016 8:18:35 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

“Trump has a YUGE !! tax cut plan”

Federal tax cuts are unrealistic - each year we are spending hundreds of billions more than we are taking in.

The past federal tax cuts were only possible because most women entered the workforce in the 1970’s and 1980’s.


26 posted on 08/08/2016 8:28:13 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas

Typically a free society is better for everyone’s bottom line. Unless you are on welfare-Trump is your guy.


27 posted on 08/08/2016 8:31:00 AM PDT by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

Another possibility to swing the election our way is proposing a state tobacco tax cap under federal law, which Congress can do because it impacts commerce.

That would mainly crimp greedy blue state government greed and get us millions of smoker votes in places like California and the Northeast.


28 posted on 08/08/2016 8:35:32 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

I’m much more concerned about the Second Amendment. And the Rats are no friend of the Second Amendment.


29 posted on 08/08/2016 8:41:50 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy

Typically a free society is better for everyone’s bottom line.


I agree. And not just financial. The “happiness” bottom line is better as well.


30 posted on 08/08/2016 8:49:04 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine
Hildebeeste is promising to raise taxes. I believe her.

Trump is promising to reduce taxes. I hope he's telling the truth.

Trump ... for a fighting chance.

31 posted on 08/08/2016 8:50:40 AM PDT by NorthMountain (Hillary Clinton: corrupt unreliable negligent traitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

If Republicans were smart (which clearly they are NOT) they would end the Federal deductibility of state and local taxes.

Blue states would be flipping to red faster than you can say H&R Block.


32 posted on 08/08/2016 9:01:58 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
The whole no estate taxes are a scam. You are taxed on money that you are inherited. I wish that lie would go away.

What's the lie?

33 posted on 08/08/2016 9:45:04 AM PDT by gogeo (I am a proud Trumpublican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

I got 150,000 from my grandfather’s will and had to pay taxes. Big scam...no taxes my butt. Huge lie that needs called out.


34 posted on 08/08/2016 10:53:28 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
That's not a lie. Estate taxes are death taxes.

It just takes a little analysis, and comparison helps. Income taxes are one kind of tax. The amount owed is based upon the financial (tax) circumstances of the recipient. The financial circumstances of the payer is irrelevant. No doubt, income taxes are paid by the recipient.

A different form of income is capital gains. The amount of tax due is based solely upon the financial circumstances of the recipient. No doubt, cap gains is paid by the recipient.

An estate tax is not like either of those. It's not an income tax, but a wealth tax. 1) It's based upon an estate, which is not income, but accumulated income, and 2) It's based upon the financial circumstances of the deceased, not the heirs. The total size of the estate subject to estate tax, IOW. The financial circumstances of the heirs is irrelevant.

Therefore, it's a tax triggered by death, it's a wealth tax, and it's calculated solely upon the financial circumstances of the deceased. It's as clear as can be that the deceased pays the taxes, and calling it a death tax is accurate.

You may disagree about the advisability of an estate tax, but it's certainly paid by the deceased.

35 posted on 08/08/2016 11:09:11 AM PDT by gogeo (I am a proud Trumpublican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

I am on Soc Sec Disability but what good will it do me if Hillary wIns and we become a 3rd world country?


36 posted on 08/08/2016 11:55:48 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Don't argue with a Liberal. Ask him simple questions and listen to him stutter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson