Posted on 07/01/2016 2:26:25 PM PDT by drewh
It is NOT what she said
You ARE ENTIRELY correct. She made NO commitment to follow reccomendations.
She purposely said that way so she could drop everything later.
To accept means to ingest.
Nothing at all said what the resulting AG ACTION taken will be. What will be the output? Everyone on earth ingests input which means nothing.
Loretta does not seem to be weathering her job very well she looks like she has gained 40 lbs and she looks like hell. The pressure is getting to her.
Boy I wish there were pictures!
Why is Rush saying we’re being played?
How? If Lynch says she will take the recommendation of the FBI, how are we being played?
No matter what happens a sizable number of people will say it is political.
The bottom line that is being lost in all of this is that what Hillary demanded her staff set up, and she used, was by it’s very nature illegal. What Hillary received and had her staff send to her was illegal. What Hillary DID NOT turn over was illegal. When Hillary and her staff decided what was demanded by law to be retained and turned over as public documents that was illegal.
As usual, the issue has become far more complicated and the talking points have made it into an argument about technicalities, but the underlying problem with all of this is that IT WAS ILLEGAL. We already know that.
I don’t see ANY WAY the FBI does not recommend charges on this. This is one of the core missions of the FBI - to protect America’s secrets. If they don’t recommend charges this would be a defacto admission of what we already know - the double standard for politics and like the housing crisis - some people are too big to fail.
I have maintained faith from the beginning that they would do the right thing and recommend charges. The real politics will start and end with the prosecutors, but simply based on what we know there are multiple felony counts that were committed by a whole host of people - not just Clinton. Frankly, people at the State Department also committed felonies by not reporting her server or or sending emails. Consider - the secret emails were received by subordinates on the state server. They were sent on the state server to the clinton server. If they removed the classification headings each of those is a felony count. The evidence trail on all of this exist on the state department server because there is no way the intelligence agencies who sent data would email it directly to a private server.
Guess we will see how this plays out, but there is little doubt this has and will damage her and the democrat brand in this election.
We shall see what happens but I’m thinking it is really good facing Hillary
She is so mistrusted & unlikable that it is really helping out TRUMP
If she gets replaced by someone that doesn’t have this trust issue TRUMP could be in deep sh*t imho!
“Accept” or accepting the FBI report to have it in hand is not the same as following the recommendation to indict. She’s playing word games.
Maybe it’s already been fixed at Comey’s level and all over but the shouting.
This should be interesting. If they recommend Hitlery be indicted and she doesn’t do it, they’re going to leak their recommendation to the public and again she will look like a lying fraud.
In his new book Crisis of Character: A White House Secret, Gary Bryne tells about another secret service agents private encounter with the GodFather, Bill Clinton, during the testimony hearings, starting on page 166-167.
Clinton approached the agent and after some small talk, he asked the agent how his wife and kids were ...They had never actually talked before.
Nothing about that was normal. It was obviously a subtle form of intimidation. The president was sending a message that he knew of the officers recent testimony,---and perhaps was sending a more sinister message.
"Former President Bill Clinton, doing his best Boss Hogg impersonation, rendezvoused with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the middle of the scorching Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport tarmac to discuss grandchildren, golf, family and of course his wifes possible indictment for violating a couple hundred national security statutes."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.