Posted on 06/19/2016 10:22:58 AM PDT by Kaslin
Rolling Stone Writer: NRA the Greatest Threat to Our Homeland Security
So American Citizens are the greatest threat to our homeland security?
After all that is what they NRA is. 4.5 Million American hunters, police officer, veterans gun owners. A Rolling stone writer sees these folks as a threat?
The stupid, it burns!
Rolling Stone is nothing but a left-wing rag
You got that right.
“we” don’t shoot each other every day in America.... that is mostly evil unhinged gang bangers who are protected by the depraved leftists such as this Rolling Stone writer.
FURS
You can all suck it.
That is why no one should pay attention to it.
When they say “make no mistake”, you are making a mistake by reading anything after it.
That’s only valid while you are living.
Boeing makes planes.....guilty!!
“The Left can only enforce the ban thru threat of violence.”
First the Left has to define “ban”. The ‘94 AWB stopped new sales of semi-autos with certain cosmetic features, while allowing said semi-autos to be sold without said features. Semi-autos already in private hands were not affected in the slightest. Not much of a “ban”, in my opinion.
Now...if by “ban” the Left means “confiscation”, then they have a hard row to hoe. Confiscating firearms is nearly impossible if said firearms have not been previously registered, unless the Left wants to turn law enforcement officers into rogue Gestapo agents, in which case there will be mutiny and insurrection not seen since the Civil War.
So...let’s pass legislation creating a national firearms registry. And while we’re at it, a firearms owner identification system such as in NY, CT, & NJ. Get to it, Congress, get it done & Obama will sign it into law PDQ.
Diane Feinstein will sponsor it, and Congress will pass it. RIIIGHT!
“But, but...they did it in Australia, didn’t they? And people had to turn in their assault weapons or go to jail, right?”
I ask fellow FReepers to google “parliamentary system of government”, as they have in UK & Oz. Under their system the head of state is elected or appointed by the majority in Parliament. If he or she wants to ban a class of guns which are already registered, the majority drafts the enabling legislation, and the thing is done. And they did it.
This is what happens when there is no constitutional separation of powers as we have here and which the Founding Fathers insured would be in our Constitution, having bitter experience with British tyranny under a King with a prime minister who did his bidding.
Hillary wants Australian style confiscation, but folks, she ain’t gonna get it. Stay calm, FRiends, and watch this week unfold with many speeches full of sound & fury, but signifying nothing.
I like my issues of Rolling Stone with pancake syrup. No butter.
I can’t believe this commie lib rag is still out there passing gas after all these years. People have just too much “expendable” income these days I guess.
I stopped buying Rolling Stone when I found out Charmin was softer.
.
Rolling Stone used to be a libertarian rag of a sort.
Now they’ve gone total tyranny.
They also deliberately do nothing to arrest and prosecute the gang bangers in Chicago who’ve made it the murder capitol of the country, slaughtering more young black males than the Klan ever fantasized of in its must lurid and pleasurably violent wet dreams. Yet, Obola and all the other murder and Islamic terrorism facilitating gun grabbers only want to take guns away from law abiding patriots. Gee, why could that be???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.