Posted on 06/08/2016 10:12:43 PM PDT by detective
The punchline:
“Due to what I believe are unfair and mistaken rulings in this case and the Judge’s reported associations with certain professional organizations, questions were raised regarding the Obama appointed Judge’s impartiality. It is a fair question.”
Interesting that he spends numerous paragraphs detailing other issues, only to reach the crux of the matter - and then only implies the real problem. I’m puzzled that he refuses to actually state the actual accusation. He won’t actually specify the “certain professional organizations”. Will be interesting to see how the master deal-maker plays this out, since so far it doesn’t seem to be going well.
I’ve seen O’Reilly for the last 3 nights insist that San Diego La Raza Attorney’s Association is unrelated to the National Council of La Raza, which is untrue.
I picture some guy saying, “I belong to the Ku Klux Klan Attorney’s Association, but it’s totally different than the KKK, and the similarity of names is just a coincidence.” Does anyone believe that anyone would be fooled by such a statement?
Trump is right, but he is losing the PR battle here.
Most Americans have no idea what LaRaza is. He needs to get on the bully pulpit and start educating them. Fast!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.