Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Dept. would need 75 years to compile Clinton emails
The Hill ^ | June 6, 2016 | Lisa Hagen

Posted on 06/06/2016 6:18:12 PM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: Soul of the South

I could actually see it taking longer to read an email 4 years after it was written than it took to write it. Typically, the person writing the email and the recipient have some degree of context concerning what the email was about, whereas someone reading it 4-8 years later would not have that context.

It may also be that the people reading the emails at State have to compare the emails to guides concerning what is not for public release and what is available for public release. I also suspect that they are having a regular employee who has other tasks to complete respond to the FOIA requests.

Finally, because of computers and the internet, the sheer volume of documents that get produced these days is very high and it would not shock me if the government has not quite gotten around to figuring out how to handle it since they seem so bad at figuring out how to handle things they have a motivation to get right.


81 posted on 06/06/2016 8:32:33 PM PDT by ronnietherocket3 (Mary is understood by the heart, not study of scripture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Total bs. Kinko’s has a division that process those suvkers in about one week. These clowns are completely off base.


82 posted on 06/06/2016 8:33:36 PM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy

Correction the physical plant I saw at Kinko”s could scan 1,000,000 sheets of paper per day.

Whoever told them 75 years needs jail time.


83 posted on 06/06/2016 8:53:21 PM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

You think it would take the IRS that long to go through that many documents belonging to a conservative?


84 posted on 06/06/2016 9:23:53 PM PDT by Lil Flower (American by birth. Southern by the Grace of God. ROLL TIDE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

It is a mystery. If it would take 75 years for the State Department to assemble and read the material....how did Hillary read it in four years? She must have been ‘blasted’ with 10,000 emails per day. Must be all that yoga-traffic.


85 posted on 06/06/2016 9:28:25 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

We have an illegitimate criminal government filled with fascist degenerate “workers”. Truly pathetic.


86 posted on 06/06/2016 9:51:35 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

I would walk into that dept and say you got 7 days to print em all in sequence or your all fired period end of story...


87 posted on 06/06/2016 10:03:52 PM PDT by straps (Loyal Trump Fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

>> it would take 75 years

Explains the time it took to respond to the Benghazi siege and murders...

Incarcerate the scumbags.


88 posted on 06/06/2016 10:16:42 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

WHAT... ON STONE FRICKING TABLETS..... ON ROPE KNOT THING THE INCAS USED.....ON ANCIENT EGYPTIAN HEIRYLOGLYPHS.....ON SUMERIAN CLAY TABLETS..... PASSED DOWN BY CAVE MEN BY FIRESIDE....

THE HELL....


89 posted on 06/07/2016 12:25:58 AM PDT by GraceG (Only a fool works hard in an environment where hard work is not appreciated...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Recall, now from decades ago, the IBM anti-trust case, where IBM was "forced" to turn over several boxcars of paper (sheets of paper - that is, hardcopy), under subpoena duces tedcum?

Perhaps a modest bounty for any/all Clinton documents can be established for a selective and public reading for we of the hoi polloi?

90 posted on 06/07/2016 2:38:56 AM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Another day, another insult to my intelligence.

Yep - with that kind of efficiency, they would still be counting hanging chads in Florida.....they must need the extra time to concoct suitable lies for all the bad looking evidence....

91 posted on 06/07/2016 3:24:43 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It takes a long time when you have to read and redact each document.


92 posted on 06/07/2016 3:45:02 AM PDT by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is..." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Wouldn’t be surprised if the Russians or Chinese are sitting on a full copy of Clinton’s emails. They can either disclose a few choice ones if they want to blow her out of the water, or better yet, hold onto them as blackmail.


93 posted on 06/07/2016 3:58:51 AM PDT by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Can I try this excuse with IRS on my tax audit?


94 posted on 06/07/2016 5:19:30 AM PDT by Boomer One ( ToUsesn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If this were a Republican they would have an army of lawyers and IT specialists working on it 24/7.

Pfft..


95 posted on 06/07/2016 6:00:15 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

If Nixon were a democrat, he would have finished his term. Republicans are the ones who eat their own. They are doing it with Trump and they’ve been doing it for decades.

Spineless disgraces.


96 posted on 06/07/2016 6:47:33 AM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Outsource it to India.


97 posted on 06/07/2016 6:47:34 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

What exactly is the point of retaining records if you can’t produce them when needed?

What a steaming pile of BS.


98 posted on 06/07/2016 7:07:24 AM PDT by Raebie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Catch a clue.

All deleted. Digital Heaven.


99 posted on 06/07/2016 8:01:14 AM PDT by Gasshog (Clinton denies... Except to see a lot of this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

IMO,This is obstruction of justice far beyond what Nixon was alleged to have done when his secretary ,Rose Mary Woods, accidentally erased 18 minutes of innocuous conversation not even in context of the break in headed up without Nixon’s knowledge by John Dean, white House Counsel. This is real obstruction here. Where is the FBI? Where is WAPO?


100 posted on 06/07/2016 9:10:04 AM PDT by WENDLE (GO TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson