Posted on 06/03/2016 6:49:50 AM PDT by LRoggy
I don’t believe I have any argument with that pronouncement or action, if things really did get that wierd.
Well, let’s hope it doesn’t come to that.
You are most likely correct about that scenario never playing out. However, your argument about having only one candidate to vote for has never been tried in a presidential election.
The issue of those third party candidates could be ruled as un-electable; hence nothing more than an indulgence to an antiquated dinosaur democratic form from the past. Again, executive order and poof law of the land.
The Communist Democrat Party.
The merger was final in 1984, the last time the CPUSA ran a POTUS candidate. Ever since then they have endorsed the Democrat candidate.
So it is the Communist Democrat Party.
Here is proof of what I stated, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_USA#Presidential_tickets
I don't like Obama. He may not even know how many states there are.
However, does the average American know ?
There are MORE THAN 50.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.