[Phlap]

In testimony Friday that lasted seven hours, three attorneys representing Mills and four from the Justice Department interrupted Judicial Watch attorneys approximately 250 times, shouting “objection” to argue why Mills should not answer the question posed.

Just why were lawyers from the DoJ there?

[InterceptPoint]

"Just why were lawyers from the DoJ there?"

That is a really, really, really good question. I assume the answer was to protect Hillary. But who knows.

Perhaps someone who has taken the time to read through the transcript can tell us whose side the DOJ lawyer was on or if he/she was just an "innocent" spectator.

[HangUpNow]

Just why were lawyers from the DoJ there?

To officially further ridicule and ignore the US Constitution and mock justice.

Should O.J. Mills screw up and mistakenly tell just a single truth, the entire stack of treasonous, perjurious, obstructionist "corpsemen" could be at risk.

[arthurus]

To the left facing inquisition not remembering something makes it cease to exist. It is more than just covering up.

[wildbill]

The Clinton gang perfected this strategy of avoiding truthful answers during Clinton’s testimony under oath during the 90s. Holder used it during his testimony before Congress.

She used “I have no specific recollection of that [conversation, document, email. etc.] or some variation just so it wouldn’t accumulate and create derision over 200 times.

I predicted this would happen months ago. No crystal ball, it’s what they use to avoid taking the 5th which looks bad.

[Pearls Before Swine]

In testimony Friday that lasted seven hours, three attorneys representing Mills and four from the Justice Department interrupted Judicial Watch attorneys approximately 250 times, shouting “objection” to argue why Mills should not answer the question posed.

SEVEN attorneys clustered around and protecting the witness, herself an attorney!

Four government attorneys, presumably paid for by us, and three paid for by ... who... the Clinton Foundation?

They're trying awful hard to protect Cankles from something, most likely the unvarnished truth.

[shotgun]

In all my depositions that I’ve had the pleasure to attend, both sides will object to the form of the questions but only for the record. They then argue to the judge later to rule on them for admission to the court record. But the person being questioned still must provide an answer.

But that was just me

[ballplayer]

Does it really surprise anyone,she is Hillarys aide and attorney,Hillary did the same thing years ago when first lady and 1 million of her emails disappeared from her first lady white house computer,by the way all of them were under subpoena at the time,same old same old.

[ballplayer]

Does it really surprise anyone,she is Hillarys aide and attorney,Hillary did the same thing years ago when first lady and 1 million of her emails disappeared from her first lady white house computer,by the way all of them were under subpoena at the time,same old same old.