Sadly, Dr Kevorkian is not accepting new patients.
Posted on 05/30/2016 11:20:46 PM PDT by Trump20162020
Except that it is a falsehood.
Beck is a Mormon jack-ass
I think it’s pretty clear what Becks mission is and who he’s truly supporting for POTUS.
Hint: the Open Borders candidate.
Keep up.
His mother was on the dole.
Canada did not recognize dual citizenship at the time.
To get free medical assistance, she had to renounce her American citizenship.
So no, Ted wasn’t. That he and his mother lied about all of this doesn’t make it not so. The truth has come out,and it’s damning.
Anything that will stick, right ?
Dead wrong.
Truth matters.
Rubio just went up in my book.
Pure sleaze.
I don’t know that Ted’s mother was sleazy. Just young and pregnant with little money. She signed her American Citizenship away to get Canadian Citizenship so she could have subsidized medical care.
Why do you insist she was sleazy?
No, I’d say his mother was a saint. You, you’re 100% sleaze.
I am an American.
Cruz’s mother was not at the time of Ted ‘ s birth.
I didn’t make her decisions for her.
She renounced her citizenship for financial benefit in her new country all on her own. It’s not a secret any more.
You can continue to have your childish little tirades.
You can scream and roll on the floor and turn blue.
You can call people who poke holes in the imaginary world you live in all sorts of names.
Ted ‘s mother was still a Canadian citizen who had given up her united States citizenship when her son was born. Ted’s father was still a Cuban citizen who had immigrated from Spain to support Fidel Castro. Ted Cruz was still born in Canada.
Sadly, Dr Kevorkian is not accepting new patients.
Sleaze and lies. Keep on slamming your keyboard, troll. Ted's 100% American. You're 100% sleaze.
Good video. From the heart.
Didn’t Ted’s mother marry a man who was still married to his first wife? I believe Rafael had not divorced Wife #1 when marrying Ted’s mother. That adds up to two sleazes.
Note the reference to Natural Law in the first sentence of our Declaration of Independence.
It is crystal clear that the Founding Fathers used the Natural Law definition of 'natural born Citizen' when they wrote Article II. By invoking "The Laws of Nature and Nature's God" the 56 signers of the Declaration incorporated a legal standard of freedom into the forms of government that would follow.
President John Quincy Adams, writing in 1839, looked back at the founding period and recognized the true meaning of the Declaration's reliance on the "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God." He observed that the American people's "charter was the Declaration of Independence. Their rights, the natural rights of mankind. Their government, such as should be instituted by the people, under the solemn mutual pledges of perpetual union, founded on the self-evident truth's proclaimed in the Declaration."
The Constitution, Vattel, and “Natural Born Citizen”: What Our Framers Knew
The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God: The True Foundation of American Law
The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.
Neither the 14th Amendment nor Wong Kim Ark make one a Natural Born Citizen
The Harvard Law Review Article Taken Apart Piece by Piece and Utterly Destroyed
Citizenship Terms Used in the U.S. Constitution - The 5 Terms Defined & Some Legal Reference to Same
"The citizenship of no man could be previous to the declaration of independence, and, as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776."....David Ramsay, 1789.
A Dissertation on Manner of Acquiring Character & Privileges of Citizen of U.S.-by David Ramsay-1789
The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)
The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God: The True Foundation of American Law
Not wanting to believe the truth doesn’t make it go away.
Nor is there anything sordid about the issue of citizenship (except of course to globalists who hate the concept of individual nations) so this isn’t about sleaze, it’s about the concept of divided loyalty.
Stop spamming this board with your crap.
That wasn’t spam.
You don’t have a coherent argument, and the reality around you is crushing to your fantasy world.
It is spam, and so are your lies. Tens of thousands of posts have debunked the falsehoods you and your fellow anti-Cruz nutters have spewed out, and they’re no more factual and correct than from the time they were spun.
You don’t like that he is 100% eligible ? That’s YOUR problem. Go deal with your delusional fantasies via the help of your nearest psychiatrist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.