Posted on 04/13/2016 4:29:56 PM PDT by springwater13
Oh seriously? That statement is beyond asinine. Comparing a non issue to illegal immigrants? Every once in awhile you make cogent posts despite your well known Cruz infatuation, but this one is beyond ridiculous.
Oh, please, do, Michelle. Please, I'm beggin' you...DO IT. Let's see it happen.
Fields is a horrible human being.
Claiming that he should be prosecuted, as you imply, means that every day people should be prosecuted from the simple act of going to Walmart, a concert, or any crowded place.
You people are so desperate it’s funny.
Maybe there’s something in your water?
Well duh - even if I am not a Trump supporter at this time, I didnt see anything to prosecute there other than possibly wearing an ugly jacket. So far, that is not a prosecutable offense!
“Higher standard?” Hell, they had no standard to even bring this stupid case.
It appears that Cruz supporters have learned that lying thing well...........
~~~~
Well Cruz said something along the lines of ‘the atmosphere of a campaign starts at the top’. ;)
I am not saying he should be prosecuted - I think the whole thing was kind of silly, and never would have gone that far if he had just apologized. But I am saying that a decision to not prosecute is NOT the same as saying he was innocent.
People complain about Trump giving to Democrats but incidents like this are exactly why you want to have the ability to pick up the phone and call in a favor.
That giant sucking sound is Cruznadien’s bitter clinging to their passifiers ...
Wait a minute: you guys were screaming that even though the “damage” was a couple of minor bruises that you get from bumping up into someone in a crowd, it was “technically” and “legally” a crime.
So “technically” and “legally” is has been ruled not a crime.
Sorry, you can’t have it both ways. If you’re talking right and wrong, what SHE did was wrong. If you’re talking law, what HE did was not illegal. You’re wrong, 100% on this one no matter how you spin it.
Levin outlined the story briefly, then continued, What Im supposed to do today, folks, is trash Michelle Fields Im supposed to pretend that the Jupiter police department is controlled by leftists and theyre out to get Donald Trump. This is the crap thats been coming over the transom to me I would ask those of you with wives, with girlfriends, with mothers, with sisters, with daughters, if some guy touched their arm that way, would you think its no big deal? Where her forearms are bruised?
http://www.dailywire.com/news/4524/levin-slams-thug-lewandowski-hank-berrien
“But I am saying that a decision to not prosecute is NOT the same as saying he was innocent.”
lol, you keep speaking nonsense. What you’re mentioning is irrelevant after the video was released, clearly showing there was nothing to prosecute.
++++
:"Ive already stated that Cruz has lost it fair and square and should step aside for the sake of the country. If his continued efforts at thievery split and destroy the party, well be saddled by Hillary or burned by Bernie."
62 posted on 4/7/2016 6:03:29 PM by Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3418598/posts?page=62#62
“is like saying an illegal is not an illegal “
No, deciding not to prosecute means they don’t think they can win. There is a lower probable cause standard in the decision to arrest. You read the article, right?
An illegal alien is by definition ... illegal, while the lefty prosecutor here isn’t sure he can pack the his jury with Cruzlims.
Face it. It’s just another instance of fact & logic-challenged `Trump derangement syndrome’ sufferers winding up with egg on their faces.
Trump’s lawyers are licking their chops, hoping this woman files a defamation lawsuit.
Fla. Stat. § 57.105. The statute provides in part:
(1) Upon the courts initiative or motion of any party, the court shall award a reasonable attorneys fee to be paid to the prevailing party in equal amounts by the losing party and the losing partys attorney on any claim or defense at any time during a civil proceeding or action in which the court finds that the losing party or the losing partys attorney knew or should have known that a claim or defense when initially presented to the court or at any time before trial:
(a) Was not supported by the material facts necessary to establish the claim or defense; or,
(b) Would not be supported by the application of then-existing law to those material facts.
You guys would crack me up, if you were not determined to hand the WH over to Clinton/Sanders.
LOL. Standard mode for Levin.
:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.