Posted on 03/16/2016 9:50:35 AM PDT by jazusamo
We’re already providing taxpayer-subsidized diapers to the president - isn’t that enough?
If these so called poor people can’t afford to care for there progeny.They shouldn’t have them.They should be forced to use birth control.
Why should the taxpayer pay for these people?
I have an idea for the use of one of those diapers.Rosa DeLauro can place it on her head to prevent the public from seeing her face.that woman looks like the wicked witch in the Wizard Of Oz.
I’m still waiting for a house to drop on her.
Just another step on the way to the government providing everything. That is known as communism, but it will never be called by that name in this country.
So don’t have kids if you can’t even afford their diapers.
“What don’t poor people have a right to?”
A productive member of society whom they legally ‘OWN’...yet?
I sure can’t think of anything NOT given to the POOR ol’ ‘poor’ (Hell, they bring in more in benefits than some that DO work for a living....whom STILL pay for the ‘poor’).
great minds and all that ; )
bkmk
We already provide free lunches (and in many cities free breakfasts) - while also providing free food for those same children.
Democrats have ensured that blacks have become wards of the state along the lines of American Indians; I know non-blacks are also on welfare, but SO MANY of his peeps have been on it for generations...
Put the used diapers on the porch, and a fresh set was delivered.
Then the diaper service started getting complaints that no fresh diapers were being sent.
Why?
Because an "adult baby" fetishist followed the delivery truck around and picked them up for his own use.
When the perp was caught, he was wearing one of the stolen diapers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.