Donald Trump dresses like a SLUT!

3/13/2016 | By Laz A. Mataz

[COBOL2Java]

I welcome a Trump presidency. The mask will come off the left and GOPe for all to see. The light will shine on these cockroaches and we can destroy them.

Which is why they are so hellbent on destroying Trump. And by "they" I mean the lot of them, from the DemocRATs down to their minions in the GOPe.

[savedbygrace]

Thank you, Laz.

[Nita Nupress]

I was going to vote for Cruz. Hello Mr. Trump - just stop bragging so much is all I ask.

I hear you. It's so old and he just needs to stop. It's starting to get on my last nerve.

[savedbygrace]

Thank you, Laz.

[Nita Nupress]

Very good job, Sir Laz. :-)

[COBOL2Java]

Whenever I read about Cruz's machiavellian rhetorical tactics, I'm reminded of another southern politician of an earlier age:

Did George Smathers really defeat Congressman Claude Pepper in a 1950 congressional election?

Campaign distortions often include certain amounts of truth but create false impressions. The classic example of this was a speech made by Rep. George Smathers of Florida in a Democratic primary campaign of 1950 for a U.S. Senate nomination in Florida.

Smathers told an audience of rural folk that incumbent Claude Pepper was "a known extrovert," practiced "celibacy" before marriage, practiced "nepotism" with his sister-in-law, "matriculated" with women in college, that his sister was "a thespian" and his brother "a practicing homo sapien."

Smathers carried the rustic vote and won the election.

[LucyT]

>>>>"After Chicago, I would also seriously question the honesty or conservatism of Cruz supporters. Cruz blatantly and unapologetically sided with the Left, their hatred of the First Amendment, and their love of violence... yet people on the Internet still think he’s the conservative candidate. Their sentiments are certainly not shared by authentic conservatives."<<<<

[Cats Pajamas]

Or a mailman.

[Lazamataz]

I try to stay fair.

[savedbygrace]

Oh wait I see. You are speaking only of the rhetorical ‘but’.

No, I am speaking of the definition of but. That is not rhetorical.

[savedbygrace]

I know, That is why I asked earlier who you were and what you had done with Laz. Cause it didn’t seem like you. Thank you.

I know we still disagree, but as long as we can have an honest debate, all is good.

[Cats Pajamas]

I agree with Melania

[Luircin]

I say again, repeating your talking points doesn’t change the fact that your god-king Cruz is a massive phony.

And he played you for a sucker, and it was so EASY for him to do too.

And I’m just sitting here laughing in your face.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!

[HandyDandy]

Mr Mataz,

May I be so humble as to suggest that you rephrase "Propaganda Ministry" to the less politically correct terminology, "Ministry of Propagana".

Your Humble Servant,

HD

[Califreak]

Hey we could all use a laugh.

Things are getting ugly.

[RKBA Democrat]

That sort of tactic works when you have relatively few sources of info and folks aren’t paying close attention.

I believe that Americans make the right choice when they’re both engaged and have the information necessary to base a decision. The internets and social media have taken care of available information aspect. Not perfectly, but good enough. And people are most definitely engaged. Hence Milhous having the problems that he is. I suspect that in the last 2 days he has lost 10% of his support. That’s yuuuuge.

[TheOldLady]

*Snort* Giggles! Indeed!

[Lazamataz]

I will post a revised version of this editorial today. There’s two glaring grammaticals, and one point I must address. It’ll be in the comments.

[TheOldLady]

Okay, my dear friend.

I read your editorial, and I agree with you, Mr. Brilliant Mataz.

[citizen]

Hahahah add me, plz