Hillary To Lose The FBI Primary

American Thinker ^ | March 8, 2016 | Daniel John Sobieski

[palmer]

That's pretty easy for her to answer also. She used the classified system when she was at the office to send classified emails to all thos parties. She used her blackberry and insecure server the rest of the time. (Yes, I realize that would be implausible, but the public is stupid and they already bought all her other stupid explanations)

Another answer she will give is that she got hardcopy only of classified material. To reply, she hand wrote notes on the hardcopy and gave it to her aides to type into a classified system. (again, completely ludicrous, but stupid people believe her)

As for "sensitive", all I can say is read the emails. I read hundreds if not 1000 or more. They are all pretty much sensitive in nature. Many are marked "SBU" which means "sensitive although unclassified". Although in her case it really means "sensitive and probably classified but I'm going to call it unclassified because I can and don't give a crap about national security".

One email was marked SBU/NF which, although technically unclassified, must be sent on secure systems. Her stupid aide sent it to her server anyway. Cause he obviously doesn't give a crap about NS either. And he is her current NS advisor. And will be her pick for NSC.

Put it this way: if she wins we are more screwed than we were under Obama.

[MHGinTN]

Um, look at what is heading up the ‘intelligence community’. The hildabeast will get a pass when all is said and done.

[John Valentine]

A superb and incisive question.

[Starboard]

If she says no, she’s a hypocrite. It was OK for her but not for others.

If she says yes, she’s obviously too careless and reckless about national security to be president.

If she equivocates, she’s vulnerable to more accusations of being dishonest.

[Roccus]

...and Watergate, from break-in to resignation, took just a little less than 26 months.