Posted on 03/08/2016 5:49:36 AM PST by raptor22
Another answer she will give is that she got hardcopy only of classified material. To reply, she hand wrote notes on the hardcopy and gave it to her aides to type into a classified system. (again, completely ludicrous, but stupid people believe her)
As for "sensitive", all I can say is read the emails. I read hundreds if not 1000 or more. They are all pretty much sensitive in nature. Many are marked "SBU" which means "sensitive although unclassified". Although in her case it really means "sensitive and probably classified but I'm going to call it unclassified because I can and don't give a crap about national security".
One email was marked SBU/NF which, although technically unclassified, must be sent on secure systems. Her stupid aide sent it to her server anyway. Cause he obviously doesn't give a crap about NS either. And he is her current NS advisor. And will be her pick for NSC.
Put it this way: if she wins we are more screwed than we were under Obama.
Um, look at what is heading up the ‘intelligence community’. The hildabeast will get a pass when all is said and done.
A superb and incisive question.
If she says no, she’s a hypocrite. It was OK for her but not for others.
If she says yes, she’s obviously too careless and reckless about national security to be president.
If she equivocates, she’s vulnerable to more accusations of being dishonest.
...and Watergate, from break-in to resignation, took just a little less than 26 months.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.