Who doesn’t want a penis on a cake?
A very simplistic answer to a complex problem. I think people should be free to serve whoever they want, and they should be free to advertise it. If you don’t want to provide services to a protected class then say so and let the market sort it out. But the ACLU would have a conniption fit over that.
With this, Kasich just removed himself from any chance of president or vice president as far as I am concerned.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/22/politics/john-kasich-increased-media-attention/ The quote is on CNN. I assume the big government liberal really said this.
Personally, I would have baked the cake for the perverts. I would have done a good job if they hired me. And I would have charged them triple to make up for dealing with something I found disgusting (I used to charge democrats triple, when I was willing to consult for them at all). That is my personal choice because, to me, baking a cake does not constitute participating in their parody of a sacred sacrament.
However, Kasich is fatally wrong on this question. Itâs not about what I would choose to do or what he would choose to do. This is about our God-given individual right to the free exercise of our religion - 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, in all areas of our lives. By arguing against protecting the God-given rights enshrined in the Constitution, Kasich is proving that my previous conclusion about him was right, as was my reasoning. Kasich does not value either the literal words of the Constitution or the idea of natural rights.
straight people need to ‘service’ gays, but gay hairdressers can refuse to cut the hair of straight moms?
I’ll never defend Kasich again. He just doesn’t get it.
This was about a WEDDING cake.
Get it, Kasich?
What a despicable idiot.