Skip to comments.
The Democrat Sharia Bill: Criminalizing Criticism of Islam
Pamela Geller ^
| 2/2/2016
| Pamela Geller
Posted on 02/03/2016 3:38:04 AM PST by HomerBohn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
What will it take for the American people to realize that the once great USA is on the skids, accelerating towards the gutter of irrelevance due to political correctness? Your democrat party has sold America, "down the river" so to speak.
1
posted on
02/03/2016 3:38:05 AM PST
by
HomerBohn
To: HomerBohn
Islam must be destroyed. It is pure evil.
2
posted on
02/03/2016 3:45:24 AM PST
by
ransacked
To: HomerBohn
Perhaps she hopes to silence all of the whisperings about her and her long-time love, Huma Abedin.Wow, Geller slips that in as if it's just an afterthought.
To: HomerBohn
If this is not when “all hell breaks loose”, Texas we should close our borders and stand guard against the hordes.
4
posted on
02/03/2016 3:46:50 AM PST
by
eartick
(Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
To: HomerBohn
A truthful statement about Islam, that does not benefit Islam by having it said, is slander.
5
posted on
02/03/2016 4:04:23 AM PST
by
Excellence
(Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
To: sauropod
6
posted on
02/03/2016 4:05:02 AM PST
by
sauropod
(I am His and He is mine.)
To: HomerBohn
The establishment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another......Sounds like that is exactly what they are attempting.
7
posted on
02/03/2016 4:14:45 AM PST
by
Safetgiver
( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
To: HomerBohn
Someone want to explain to Geller what a non-binding resolution is?
To: HomerBohn
1st amendment, 2nd amendment..... It’s all to be pissed upon by the Dhimmicrats
9
posted on
02/03/2016 4:22:02 AM PST
by
Vaquero
( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Safetgiver
This is a start down that path... It begins with criticism of islam, and will be extended to criticism directed at minorities, non-Christian religions, homosexuals, communists, illegal aliens, and other constituencies of the Democrat party.
The final step is to then make such criticism illegal, and punishable by imprisonment and then we have become the USSR
10
posted on
02/03/2016 4:25:32 AM PST
by
Ouderkirk
(To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
To: DoodleDawg
Someone want to explain to Geller what a non-binding resolution is? She knows it's part of Dhimmicrat incrementalism. Don't be fooled, non binding is just a start. I didn't think they'd get away with “hate-crimes “ but thought crimes are now illegal.
11
posted on
02/03/2016 4:26:12 AM PST
by
Vaquero
( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: ransacked
Islam must be destroyed. It is pure evil.
Yes, it is. It is a lie. And it is completely incompatible with civilization.
12
posted on
02/03/2016 4:50:42 AM PST
by
Montana_Sam
(Truth lives.)
To: Excellence
It seems a good place to insert my current tagline.
13
posted on
02/03/2016 5:23:59 AM PST
by
Fireone
(The future must belong to those who tell the truth about Islam.)
To: HomerBohn
Somebody tell me again how Barack Hussein Obama is not a Muslim.
14
posted on
02/03/2016 5:40:47 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Viruses and diseases must be DemocRATS. They love open borders.)
To: HomerBohn
It's already criminal in Europe, and that is why I have written about Orks, as a test of freedom there. Will the Eurocrats also outlaw allegory?
15
posted on
02/03/2016 5:49:07 AM PST
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: HomerBohn
It will still be okay to ban, prohibit, trash and spew hate at Christians and Jews under the First Amendment though, right?
This isn't America anymore.
16
posted on
02/03/2016 5:55:54 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Viruses and diseases must be DemocRATS. They love open borders.)
To: HomerBohn
That kind of sloppy reasoning may pass for thought on most campuses today, Word!
17
posted on
02/03/2016 6:00:33 AM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.)
To: DoodleDawg
Someone want to explain to Geller what a non-binding resolution is? You want to bet that no "progressive" federal judge won't use that "non-binding" resolution as cover for his decision that anti-Islamic speech is a hate crime?
18
posted on
02/03/2016 6:03:05 AM PST
by
PapaBear3625
(Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
To: HomerBohn; newgeezer
On the bright side, The Lord and His apostles didn’t need a first amendment to speak the truth.
19
posted on
02/03/2016 6:04:24 AM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.)
To: PapaBear3625
You want to bet that no "progressive" federal judge won't use that "non-binding" resolution as cover for his decision that anti-Islamic speech is a hate crime? Yes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson