Skip to comments.
Judge orders employer to pay man $115,000 for not letting him use women’s bathroom
LifeSiteNews ^
| 2/2/16
| Father Mark Hodges
Posted on 02/02/2016 2:13:26 PM PST by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 last
To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
61
posted on
02/03/2016 12:22:58 AM PST
by
lonevoice
(Life is short. Make fun of it.)
To: wagglebee
If a person “changes sex,” a change so fundamental that they aren’t the same person, doesn’t that warrant a hiring initiative? I wouldn’t hire this person, then.
62
posted on
02/03/2016 8:18:11 AM PST
by
fwdude
To: wagglebee
I used to use Deluxe Checks, but not anymore. Not if they are going to grovel before this deranged world view.
63
posted on
02/03/2016 8:19:09 AM PST
by
fwdude
To: Gamecock
They should let the man sit up on that toilet like a gargoyle I say.
64
posted on
02/03/2016 10:59:05 AM PST
by
Lil Flower
(American by birth. Southern by the Grace of God. ROLL TIDE!!)
To: Zeneta
I speak from some experience. Many years ago I was a Branch Manager/Stock Broker and we had any number of unwarranted claims made by idiot clients because they lost money. These claims went to binding arbitration and were settled behind closed doors. Sometime in the early 1990âs there was some ruling that allowed these arbitration hearings and settlements to become public. The lawyers had a field day. The number of fallacious claims went through the roof and as a result it severely hampered business and firms found it cheaper to settle a claim than fight.
I actually advised my firm to settle a $400,000 claim for $35,000 even though the client had no real basis. He claimed that he lost this money because we allowed him to place trades while he was stoned on drugs and we supposedly knew he was stoned.
Even in hindsight, I canât say it was wrong to settle.You did what you thought was right.
Those who gained much money from false claims WILL pay for it later on. Never fails.
And, you know, I really would NOT like to be there when "what goes around comes around." It won't be pretty and I wouldn't want to witness it.
If he's still a "stoner" he will be paying the price sooner rather than later.
To: trisham
I'm not sure that's required. Consider Bruce Jenner.What a real disappointment he was.
He is still a man, despite any cosmetic surgery. He WILL age like a man. DNA can't be altered...yet.
To: ShasheMac
I’d like to use the bathroom in the Oval Office.
OK?
To: sasquatch
I wasn’t referring to the room. ;)
68
posted on
02/03/2016 4:21:29 PM PST
by
ShasheMac
(www.needGod.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson