Posted on 01/19/2016 12:46:21 PM PST by Rummyfan
IKR and the worst thing is that the third worlders that most women support treat women far worse than the west ever thought of doing!
A good argument against abortion.
I’m not sure most women are rabid anti-Westerners. I think the problem is more that they are driven by their short term feelings vs. a consideration of long term consequences. When that 5 year old Syrian boy drowned off the Turkish coast, there was a predictable outpouring of sympathy (mostly from women), which led to an ill considered policy change.
Even worse than women though are the men who know better and pander to women to get power. Basically, most Democratic men.
Powerful.
“I am a woman, and, while I agree that a lot of women act stupid and vote for Rats, I think your figure is ridiculous”
It’s statistical, at the edges - if 45% of men are idiots and only men vote, then society survives. If 45% of men are idiots and 60% of women are idiot and all vote, then that same society collapses.
In fact, in this country, the only reason we haven’t yet followed Europe down the tubes is due to the conservative Christians in the South. They (men and women there) are still keeping us afloat, but with immigration as it is, they may get outnumbered soon.
Gird up your loins, folks. This is going to be a huge deal and very soon and very bloody.
The disadvantage that Mark carries into his analysis is that he’s not a warrior; he’s an intelligent writer. He looks at statistics, numbers and other liberal scholarly crap and arrives at an incorrect conclusion but that’s okay, Mark, still luv ya.
” Because I believe that diversity is not our strength but our Achilles’ heel, my money is on Japan. It might be the only nation to survive and prosper.”
That’s 20th century thinking, nat.
The nation that will survive and prosper is India. By 2030, half the population in China will be 50-years of age or older. By that same date, half the population of India will be 30-years of age or younger. The stupid ChiComm apes have aborted their future. Private equity firms have been fleeing China in droves since 2011. India will be the military and economic powerhouse in Asia in the 21st century. Even today, right now, broadband companies cannot keep up with demand in India.
Cheers, Nat.
It's funny you would say that when I had made the specific points:
Japan has not subscribed to the Ponzi scheme of admitting immigrants. Instead Japan is betting its future on technology, especially robotics, in the hope that they can preserve their homogenous society and maintain and grow their standard of living
In 1906 the British launched Dreadnought and in afternoon rendered every ship on every ocean in the world obsolete.
In 1945 United States dropped a bomb on Hiroshima which instantly made mass armies vulnerable.
In 1958 the Russians launched Sputnik which revolutionized everything from communications to warfare.
The computer chip has produced smart phones, smart televisions and smart automobiles not to mention robots which make production lines of the kind pioneered by Henry Ford not obsolete but virtually unthinkable.
If in the wake of these technological advances you think that the power and wealth of the country resides in its masses rather than in its technology, you are free to do so, but to accuse others of living in the twentieth century is, at best, amusing. What is not amusing is the failure to understand that masses such as exist in China and in India are not assets but huge liabilities.
And all the more of a liability when they are diverse as they are in India and were, for example, in the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.