Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court won’t review laws banning assault weapons
Washington Post ^ | December 7, 2015 | Robert Barnes

Posted on 12/07/2015 7:34:36 AM PST by TroutStalker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: massgopguy

SCOTUS wouldn’t be ruling on a ban on “assault weapons”; they’d rule on a the rights of states and localities to regulate firearms based on specific and defined features.

We don’t want a ruling on that because we don’t know what way it would go. Especially considering past precedents upholding elements of various firearms acts and the language from Heller. Specifically Scalia saying that Heller isn’t absolute.


61 posted on 12/07/2015 11:13:26 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Correctly defined: Assault rifle... (not “weapon”.. all weapons are for defense or assault):

A select-fire automatic loading rifle which can be selected by the user to: 1.) fire 1, or 2, or 3 shots per each trigger pull, OR 2.) fire fully automatic firing as a machine gun for as long as the trigger is engaged.

This differentiates from a semi-automatic rifle which autoloads and can only fire one round per trigger pull..period, regardless WHAT the weapon looks like.

FReepers?


62 posted on 12/07/2015 11:21:32 AM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker

The Second Amendment, based on “natural law” to guarantee freedom to citizens was ratified on December 17, 1791.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The term “arms” was used to include any and all weapons necessary to secure a free state, from knives to handguns to rifles, mortars, cannons.

“...shall not be infringed.” means exactly what it says. If the “law of man” requires a citizen to ask “mother may I?” or pay fees or taxes in order to have a chance of government granting permission - it is NO LONGER A RIGHT but is PRIVILEGE!

Should the laws of man limit citizens to ONLY have arms suitable of, i.e. “sporting purposes” or target shooting - that is also infringement on the rights of man to defend against evil or a tyrannical government!

Should the constitutional scholars on the Supreme Court NOT be able to arrive at a 9-0 decision supporting the plain language of the 2nd amendment - they should be removed from the court and replaced by judges who understand the US Constitution!


63 posted on 12/07/2015 11:23:14 AM PST by CitizenBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Bring back flashing fonts! UPVOTE YOUR FAVORITE POST WITH BLINKY SCHTUFF.


64 posted on 12/07/2015 3:11:39 PM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xzins
We need to stop using “semi-automatic” and describe these as not machine guns.

FWIW, the MSM has successfully ingrained in every ignorant person's mind that any rifle used in a crime is either an assault weapon or an AK-47.

I remember specifically a few years ago here in Detroit where an on scene old lady witness to a drive by shooting said: "It sounded like an AK-47"........

Well kudos to her since I am familiar with many firearms and have no idea how to discern the sound of an AK-47 from any other rifle............

As a side note, I will forever remember local WXYZ's Bill Proctor reporting on a shooting in Detroit. In his own words: "Detroit Police are searching for a .357 Smith and Wesson Glock Pistol"..........

65 posted on 12/07/2015 3:27:45 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Glock is really branching out, aren’t they? LOL!


66 posted on 12/07/2015 3:58:55 PM PST by xzins (HAVE YOU DONATED TO THE FREEPATHON? https://secure.freerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner; Jim Robinson

This punctuation stuff happened right after there was that “attack” or whatever it was where FR was being tagged as a virus site or something. I imagine Jim is on top of it - but I wonder if the two are related? (I’m no computer expert).


67 posted on 12/07/2015 4:02:45 PM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
I had been away for much of the year, so I wasn't sure when this started. But some here have stated it has been for a while.

It's not a huge issue for me, other than readability. Those who post daily or a lot may be spending a lot of time correcting their posts.

I got tired of correcting the punctuation in my C&P responses, so I created a userscript for Greasemonkey today (under Firefox) to manually fix the punctuation. It's not perfect, as I cannot correct all punctuation that is part of C&P responses by others, but it's better.

68 posted on 12/07/2015 4:27:19 PM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: houeto

But posters are not doing that and it’s becoming very hard to read a lot of the material being posted. Annoying.


69 posted on 12/07/2015 8:47:11 PM PST by conservaKate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; Salvation; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

70 posted on 12/07/2015 9:54:24 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker

I did not expect that they would review the laws. From this point on into the foreseeable future, obama’s Supreme Court will not do anything to make it easier for gun owners.


71 posted on 12/07/2015 10:00:09 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

You got that right.


72 posted on 12/07/2015 10:02:31 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CitizenBob
I will not be satisfied that 2A is being recognized until myself and my 3 best 3%er buddies are inbound on D.C. flying a tight diamond formation of A-10s bearing a compliment of arms in the 2000 pound range.
73 posted on 12/08/2015 1:02:04 AM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

I’m a visual learner and it’s been a while but for the shorter ones I’ve actually gotten to learn that it is just quotes or apostrophes. Easy to learn just two new symbols. It’s good for you! Try learning Chinese, too , that might help.

I usually read the source article anyway. Cracks me up that most who mention it don’t bother with that. I’ve learned more about a subject that is crucial to our survival as a republic.


74 posted on 12/08/2015 3:44:25 AM PST by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
What a bunch of pussies.

Love, Ralph & Stacey

75 posted on 12/08/2015 7:00:11 AM PST by NonValueAdded (In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf
Let's hope that's after several of the SCOTUS members have been retired and replaced by true conservatives.

Let's hope thats after several of the SCOTUS members have been retired and replacements appointed by a true conservative.

[fixed!]

76 posted on 12/08/2015 12:03:00 PM PST by archy (Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except bears, they'll kill you a little, and eat you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...

Combined General and Maryland “Freak State” PING!


77 posted on 12/08/2015 9:03:19 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Terrorism, the thing that shall not be named by the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson