Careful, sometimes they shoot back.
Posted on 11/25/2015 3:23:48 PM PST by Red in Blue PA
If more than one person was involved in the decision, bring charges under RICO.
The only way this stuff will stop is if the wanta be tyrants get prison time.
Why go to a zoo if you can’t hunt. Last time I bagged a dozen penguins.
Many of Houston’s parks and properties are no longer managed by the city. They’ve been privatized to crony interests.
Careful, sometimes they shoot back.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houston_First_Corporation
http://www.chron.com/default/article/Government-corporation-to-run-Houston-conventions-1617456.php
The city is handing over control of the George R. Brown Convention Center to a newly created government corporation, much as it did with the zoo nearly a decade ago.
City Council still will approve the annual budget of Houston First, a merger of the city’s Convention and Entertainment Facilities Department and the existing government corporation that runs the city-owned Hilton Americas. The mayor will appoint the board members.
The corporation will not have to come to the council to get expenses approved. The unionized work force of the city department will become private-sector employees of the corporation. The corporation is free to take chances by, for example, launching new trade shows without worrying that taxpayers are on the hook if the event is a bust.
Houston First will rent the GRB, Jones Hall and the Wortham Center from the city.
Ric Campo, who chairs the hotel corporation board and will similarly lead Houston First, said the merger not only combines marketing functions that could result in more convention business for the city, but it also creates a connection that could allow the profits from the Hilton to flow toward needed renovations of the city’s premier downtown arts venues...
The type of signs I ignore. If it’s public property, I’m going in. If it’s private property, then I don’t need to go there, especially to spend money.
Walker said in his September letter that the zoo’s signs were in violation of a state code because even though the zoo is privately owned, it sits on property owned by the City of Houston.
Houston Zoo spokeswoman Jackie Wallace said the signs were put back because the zoo is an educational institution that exempts if from being forced to allow firearms within its gates. Wallace said the zoo has an Education Department that employs 17 professional educators.
Residents may file complaints about unlawful gun restrictions by government entities to be forwarded to the state’s attorney general for potential fines. Local governments risk daily fines of up to $10,000, depending on the number of violations, if they fail to remove signage deemed illegal.
Can I hunt squirrels?
IN! I hate squirrels.
I think in Jan 2016 they will not have a leg to stand on. If they have one now.
What’s the legal answer here?
They may be a non-profit, but it’s a real stretch to say that they are an educational institution. Even so, the zoo only leases the land from the city, so it is still city property.
SB 273 protects citizens from improperly posted 30-06 signs used to coerce CHL holders into unnecessarily disarming on government property.
And what about the statute’s teeth? Violators would face a minimum fine of $1,000 for the first incident, and as much as $10,500 for any subsequent violations.
And what about government violations?
The measure, filed in January, would not only prohibit many state and local public buildings from barring lawful concealed carry, it would strip sovereign immunity from governmental bodies and officials who pursued such policies and allow them to be sued by gun owners for damages.
TY
“handguns not permitted on zoo grounds.’
= = =
In English?
Why not Swahili, for the monkeys to read.
Or what ever Koko the Gorilla communicates with.
Zoo Lives Matter.
Why go to a zoo if you can’t hunt. Last time I bagged a dozen penguins.
******************************************************************
I got a Bald Eagle..............................................tasted like chicken.
“...which state “handguns not permitted on zoo grounds.”
Texas law requires that a very specific sign (known as a 30.06 sign) be posted to notify CHL holders that concealed carry of a firearm is not permitted.
FWIW, the county tax office where I live has a sign up stating that “concealed carrying of a firearm is prohibited..”, but it’s not the required 30.06 sign, so it doesn’t apply to Texas CHL holders.
It’s my understanding that Texas law prohibits local governments from banning CHL holders from carrying on city or county property. If the zoo has posted 30.06 signs, then maybe that’s where the issue lies.
sarc/
Seems reasonable.
Except for the smallest animals handguns just aren't adequate for a humane kill.
Extreme agreement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.