U.S. Backed Moderate Rebels Put Alawite Women in Cages to Protect Themselves from Airstrikes

The Arab Source ^ | 11/01/15 | Leith Fadel

[Norm Lenhart]

Actually this idiocy you just spouted reminds me of the joke about the kid standing on a bridge with John Holmes taking a leak. Holmes says “Damn the water’s cold!” The kid replies “Yea and it’s deep too.”

[EvilCapitalist]

And you can’t fully trust the ones who have converted away from islam if you are aware of Taqiyya.

[Norm Lenhart]

It’s like trusting a champion Pitbull fighting dog with your baby. It’s just a matter of time.

[EvilCapitalist]

Right you are.

[EvilCapitalist]

The only way I’d trust a muslim who supposedly converted to Christianity is to have him or her pass the “bacon test”.

[Norm Lenhart]

Not even then. Anything is OK as long as the cause of Allah is advanced. Even bacon.

[Finny]

Norm to Yardstick and others who defend voting for Republicans like Romney:

YOU empowered the GOP to move left and they did. The only crazy person is you. But you arent crazy are you. You are a leftist with an agenda and in 12 you succeeded in getting 65,000,000 to not only waste their vote on a loss, but to empower your leftist candidates, one of which just said FOAD to America over cutting the funds from Planned Parenthood.

You did that. YOU. PERSONALLY.

Without YOUR browbeating many here would never have voted for him and thus would never have had Paul Ryan in a position ANYONE would have turned to him for over filling Bhoner’s shoes.

YOU are responsible. You and those here and across the right like you.

Personally.

What Norm said. When you vote for a leftist Republican but label it as voting "against" a leftist Democrat, it means you want to avoid being accountable for what you voted for.

In 2012, what was the difference between voting for Romney and voting "against" Obama?

Buehler? Buehler?

[Finny]

Question at the end of post 147:

In 2012, what was the difference between voting for Romney and voting against Obama?

The answer is proof that voting "against" only signifies that you don't want to be accountable for what you voted for.

[mkjessup]

Stop pinging me. That goes for you and your dead horse.

No need to repsond to this post, just comply.

[Norm Lenhart]

Well you were all gung ho on defending your liberal yesterday. Didn’t get the rest of the idiots to help back the cause? So now you just don’t wanna deal with it?

This is simple. If you no matter what types are tired of hearing about it, then stop pushing lesser evil crap and making excuses. All of us would rather spend time fighting the people openly in the GOPDNC than having to fight 3 year old idiocy here. But as long as people insist on defending leftism here, we’ll keep fighting it.

[mkjessup]

First of all, my #149 was not even directed at you, but at a FReeper that suddenly seems to want to ping me to every post they make. It has been a long FR tradition NOT to ping someone if they don't want to be pinged, and that is what I was reminding said FReeper of, nothing more and nothing less.

Second, Don't put words in my mouth Norm. I was not 'defending' Romney yesterday, my entire commentary was based on two aspects:

1.) FReepers like Blackelk and others who did everything they could to "destroy Mittens candidacy" (Blackelk exact quote), which means they made common cause with the Obama campaign, as they had the very same goal.

2.) This persistent tendency by the Defenders of the Conservative Faith(c) to declare jihad on any FReepers who decided to hold their nose and pull the lever for the GOP ticket in 2012. FReepers like that were not necessarily voting so much FOR Romney & Ryan, they were voting AGAINST Obama and his policies, regardless of the whirling dervish of flawed logic which has been employed by some saying "you always vote FOR, you never vote AGAINST!", just like some kid with a broken record on a toy record player.

I'm not defending leftism at all, and your suggestion that I (and others) are doing so is offensive. You are behaving like an Islamic radical, ordering fatwas and jihads against any and all who don't measure up to your expectations.

Speaking of yesterday, you said that JimRob later said that voting for Romney was a 'mistake' on his part, how about citing that post of his, just for the record? I'd like to see it.

[Norm Lenhart]

Do a search or ask him yourself. I don’t keep records.

[mkjessup]

For something that monumental that you trotted out to support your own post, I’m surprised you didn’t.

[Norm Lenhart]

Nothing monumental at all. It’s been common knowledge for a while.

[mkjessup]

Well have a nice evening anyway. Don’t have me fitted for one of those orange jumpsuits for my decapitation quite yet, ok?

[Norm Lenhart]

I don’t advocate decapitation. I’m the guy that advocates putting liberals in cages an existential issue.

[mkjessup]

Yeah I know, but do you advocate feeding them nutritious meals and letting them out for supervised exercise, or do you think they should just be burned alive inside their cages?

[BlackElk]

Yardstick:

If you want to call yourself conservative in spite of the evidence of your posts, ya gotta get control over your rampaging Pollyanna there, Hoss. Romney may well have been even worse since his election would have formalized the Uniparty and he would have been AT LEAST as bad as Obozo. The sorry remnant of the GOP would be in smoking ruins unless you think that the care and feeding of Muffy's trust fund is the be all and end all of American public life.

[BlackElk]

No, WE conservatives, WE patriots, WE loyal Americans (the word we does not suggest anything including you) did NOT put Obozo in the White House. His re-election was a lead pipe cinch guarantee the moment that Romney, Wall Street, K Street, the abortionists, the gun grabbers, the fudge packer "marriage" lobby, the peace at any price tribe, etc., etc., etc. BOUGHT the GOP-E nomination for the slimy bastard that is Willard or Obozo in whiteface. You sound like Willard offered you a job. If not then your Pollyanna has outstripped any rationality that may have remained to you. Nominate another turd like Romney and you will be saying hello to POTUS Hillary.

WE (as defined above) simply refused to dishonor ourselves, our party and our nation by joining YOU in voting for Willard who is every bit as reprehensible a waste of oxygen as his mommy and daddy before him and likely his kids after him.

[BlackElk]

You are wallowing in sour grapes here and you are denying reality in a self-serving attempt (three years after your absolute loser, ummmm, LOST) to justify your apostasy from actual conservatism. CONSERVATIVES do not owe you or your pathetic Willard a single vote. You apparently believe that the Demonrats are the only boogiemen in American politics. You refuse to recognize that Romney is just as bad like his daddy and mommy before him. WE still owe NO VOTES to you or top your pathetic leftist loser and Obozo clone and you won't get them. Each time the Inside the Beltway trash, the Wall Street trash, the K Street trash gets its collective way and their $$$$$ nominates a McCain, a Romney, a Dole, a GHWB, a Ford, a Nixon, the number of fed up former Republicans grows. Short of the GOPEE nominating another Reagan (Ted Cruz, maybe Trump, name another), we ain't coming back. I am ashamed to say that I voted for each and every GOP POTUS nominee from Nixon in 1968 to McCain in 2008. All I got was two terms of Ronaldus Maximus. I am not settling any more. Rule or ruin. The sooner we shake off the disreputable dust of the GOPEE, McCain, Romney, Dole, GHWB, Ford, Nixon, McConnell, Cockroach, Cornyn, Corker, Alexander, Nancyboy Kirk, Boehner, Cantor, McCarthy, Ryano, etc., the better. Start over.

Oh, and I voted for FR's own Eternal Vigilance (Tom Hoefling) and others here voted for Virgil Goode. And, apparently you would have voted for Charles Manson so long as he had the GOPEE nomination. Not a Demonrat, not a boogieman, right?

You ARE what you vote FOR. Own it! We are certainly not crazy. We just recognize you and yours for what you are.