Posted on 10/23/2015 8:31:54 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3352042/posts?page=174#174
So you wouldn’t mind hosting them!
They think that it was awful to quarantine princess Kaci.
Whats awful is someone that has a potential plague in them walking freely among us.
Then again I have a conscience and would quarantine myself rather than wipe out half the country. I’m kinky like that. Once, most people were.
I’ve explained several times why there is a difference between saying that they do not need to be quarantined and saying that I would want to live with or host them. “No close contact” does not require a quarantine. But you just don’t get it. So you, once again, go round and round in circles, repeatedly ask me questions I’ve already answered, and repeat the same points over and over again.
Once again, history has proven my position correct. You and people like you were predicting a massive outbreak in the US. It never happened. Because the recommended protocols (and first-world infrastructure) stop Ebola in its tracks. You can keep going on and on about how dangerous this non-infected nurse was, or could have been in an alternate universe. But that does not change the fact that there was no outbreak. She didn’t infect anyone. The protocols worked. The sky did not fall.
And I have shown that your position is contradictory.
You won’t host those exposed to Ebola in your house (174) but insist they aren’t an issue if no symptoms are present (31).
Even worse, the zombies who think it was awful to expect princess Kaci to...not break quarantine!
Existential Cage Theory is EXISTENTIAL. Literally.
She acted in a petulant childish manner, and should be treated as a child until she shows adult cognition.
Thats what cages are for. To treat them and their supporters like the childish unthinking animals they are.
“Time out box” after a fashion, might work.
Yes. For all time.
And I have repeatedly explained why that is not contradictory (and thus why the protocols recommend against close contact, but do not recommend quarantine). Your failure to acknowledge my answer does not change that fact.
I loved reading the following:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6417a6.htm
http://throb.gizmodo.com/turns-out-the-ebola-virus-can-be-sexually-transmitted-1737730480
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-1012-ebola-fever-20141012-story.html
12.9% present no fever, and it is transmissible for over five months after being “cleared”.
And Princess felt that quarantines were for the little people.
And we still have no idea where this bug hides between outbreaks, don’t know long term post infection secondary behavior.
It is contradictory.
And she did NOT follow protocols.
She acted in a manner of a spoilt brat who should have had her backside warmed and put in a corner.
The only upside to Ebola is that when the liberals finally unleash it or another killer pandemic, it’s liberals that are most poorly suited to survive it or the Roadwarrior/fallout world it leaves behind.
Darwin wasn’t entirely mistaken it seems.
Sadly.
And it does seem that a brutish existence is what is coming to the US.
It is not contradictory:
People who have been exposed to Ebola are not contagious unless and until they develop Ebola symptoms. So, no quarantine is necessary and thus not part of the protocols.
But, when they develop symptoms and start shedding bodily fluids (sweat, vomit, diarrhea, etc.), those fluids are VERY contagious. Which means that living with someone when they begin to show symptoms is highly risky. So, avoiding close contact is necessary and thus part of the protocols.
Yes, it is contradictory.
Would you host someone in your house who was exposed to Ebola?
What this all comes down to is spelled out clearly in the 1936 Communist goals. To be specific, Liberals took over education and the med/psych profession just as their forebears, the open communists instructed.
The result has been 3 solid generations denied factual education and given agenda science, along with a megadose of feelgood.
The result is as hard to predict as night following day.
People get their groins all sandy over me saying that sort of thing and calling me and others that see the reality, doomsayers and tinfoilers. So be it. Doesn’t change the truth of how we got here or where we are going. And we are GOING there precisely because they refuse to do a solitary thing to change course.
Elect more lesser evil. That’s sure to fix the problem. I mean how couldn’t electing the very people responsible fix things? See 3 generations of miseducation for why adults in 2015 on the right think exactly like that.
If they don’t think like that, I challenge anyone to explain why they keep electing them to do it.
“In the land of children, Santa Claus wins elections” forget where I heard it, but it suits what we’ve been seeing.
And it is the sure outcome of that infiltration you point out.
Heck, the proof is in entitled princess Kaci’s behavior.
And those defending it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.