Posted on 10/18/2015 12:23:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
We got some new SPs!!!
Thanks, danamco.
A lot SPs have popped out of the woodwork lately.
They’ve been here all along, just staying below the radar. Wonder how many are paid operatives.
(With our tax dollars, of course.)
You’re not entitled to your own set of *facts*, PDad...
Trump wants PP defended, in light of the horrific videos and purchasing PRIVATE insurance, across state lines, is NOT socialized healthcare.
Sprinkling leftist terminology into your false posts proves you do NOT know the truth about Trumps stand.
It also proves you prefer a ¡Jeb! or Hellary win.
Rally and poll numbers don’t lie. Who is your candidate and where is she/he polling and how many people attend their stops?
SP’s...It’s pretty obvious, isn’t it?
Their vitriol is the first clue. They must actually get paid bonuses for every time they slam/smear FR posters, over numerous back and forths...and ultimately get the “final word”.
It definitely seems they’re SP’s, because NO candidate in their right mind would want this kind of “supporter” and the graduated level of venom they spew is incredible.
To come onto a thread where JimRob has posted a guideline on an issue, and to argue against so vehemently, is a sign of sheer desperation. To do so in such a hateful manor is outright foolishness.
Time to get Tough is Trump’s policy manifesto. There is no mention of gun control in it.
My candidate is Ted Cruz.
Beyond that there is nothing to discuss because my principles aren’t for sale.
If you watched his recent interviews you would know he changed his mind and why. 1999 is fifteen years ago!
Have you changed your mind about anything in the last fifteen years?
Simple question: ,,,,,,,,,,,,. Is Barry, Barrack, Hussein, Obama, Soetoro eligible to occupy the W.H.???
Simple answer.
He’s there now and will be there until the end of his term.
Why should anyone believe anything out of any candidate’s mouth?? I can’t make you believe anything. When candidates get to Washington things change - even with Reagan - he got stuck with George 1 as VP to throttle him back. Trump has a network outside the professional political class like no other candidate, he has the ability and possibility to put together a team like we have never ever seen. No other candidate comes close in that respect. He is *the only* one talking about things like corporate inversion.
Obviously you have irrationally closed your mind, if you refuse to watch even a few minutes of the video. Like four chapters out of hundreds and hundreds of deals is some sort of fatal flaw.
The note holders bargained for interest and return of principal. They got neither.
Four chapters out of hundreds of positive deals, whoop-de-doo. Statically that low of a percentage is called noise.
Because I can look to their past to see if their past is credibly consistent with what they’re saying noe.
This is why we primary rinos. They promise us one thing and then go off and do another. Then, when election season rolls around, they promise to be conservative this time, if re-elected. And more and more, we don’t believe, and we vote for other Republicans in the primary.
Why does this not apply to presidential candidates? I know that Cruz has done conservative THINGS, not just talked conservative talk. I know that he is consistent in his words and actions. I understand his political philosopy and know how and why he thinks and acts as he does. I see know real political philosophy for trump, just a philosophy of whatever helps trump achieve his current goal is good. Trump has previously done and said liberal things. He has given to dammocraps. He has stated that he supports various dammocraps. He supported the kenyan anti-christ in ‘08. He supported obamacare. He supported single payer healthcare. He supported gun control, and abortion on demand, including partial birth abortin. For some time, he was a registered dammocrap. He bought and sold politicians and was a a crony capitalist.
He used dammocrap talking points to lie about Gov. Walker.
He pulled stuff out of his ass to lie about Dr. Carson.
He put the faults of Clinton Bush to lie about George W Bush.
He sought bankruptcy protection FOUR times, and stiffed bond holders of billions.
So, now he comes and says he’s a conservative. He’s saying he’s pro 2nd amendment, pro life, the whole thing. That represents quite a turn around for a life-long liberal. But I look at this man’s history and see that his word means very little to him, that he’s willing to change the terms of a deal unilaterally, to his favor. I see he has no problem telling blatant lies about others to get ahead.
So, his alleged conservatism looks like one more lie to get what he wants, the nomination as the Republican nominee for presisent. And he’s lied well enough, and decieved so many people that it looks like he may well get it. And combined with his lomg-held protectionist views, he may win over enough disaffected liberals, you know, Michael moore, Rosie o’donnel, and the Occupy Wall Street gang, that he may win a sweeping, bipartisan victory in November 2016.
And then our country will have elected the Great Deciever.
But I refuse to be decieved.
People identify the problem somewhat accurately, but are prescribing poison as the treatment.
He could be more popular than the Beatles in 1964, although, he may think he is but he’s not. I don’t care many people he decieves. I refuse to be decieved.
Trump is poison? I disagree. What part of any of Trump’s position papers is poison? I don’t see any poison at all in his pressers or rallies. I think he will try for all he’s worth to do what he’s promised or die trying. He knows what it means to those supporting him and the country. In the clip I’m trying to get you to watch he says “I give you my word”. He says “my business means nothing to me anymore, my children and executives will run it, this is so much more important.” Like Ann Colter said Trump is a candidate who life will be immeasurably worse by being president, it’s like he sees the silent majority who until not had no voice, he wants to give them a voice, he’s actually said that. He’s willing to make the sacrifice.
Trump’s not as shallow as you imply - if you watched a few pressers or rallies you would see that.
I don't trust Trump, so that means I trust those three?
Care to explain the logic in that?
The jihadists are already in place in the US. Obama has shipped them in and left the border wide open for them to set up shop in the US.
If Trump gets elected, he better work fast to round ‘em up and ship them out or he’ll be “responsible” for Isis attacks in the US.
Trump’s plan to secure the borders and deport illegals is better than Bush’s operation of open borders and denial of danger. His habit of telling the politically incorrect truth about life is to his advantage as well.
Bush’s lie or delusion of calling Islam “the religion of peace” left him flat footed when he took office. In a sane world, he would have every reason to be distrustful of Saudi jihadists but he thought he was friends with the Saudis. Then Saudis blew up the World Trade Center.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.