Posted on 09/21/2015 7:28:34 AM PDT by Kaslin
It’s amazing how willfully hateful some people can be towards Donald. Methinks some mirrors need to be passed out to the critics.
By the way nobody welches on creditors like, say, the Kennedys or Clintons... who are you trying to have America rush into the arms of?
Trump’s BUSINESS bankruptcies (he never had personal ones) were Chapter 11. That is a restructure, not a walkaway.
Facts are facts. Trump is responsible for misrepresenting the facts.
Methinks some mirrors need to be passed out to the critics.
A post devoid of content.
As for MALDEF lawsuits... look, the Obama administration is just rolling over. Trump won’t.
Trump presented the view that would highlight his ability to negotiate. Trump would not have to line item veto anything. It is pertinent to look at this view of things.
Devoid of content? You ipso facto declare yourself void of hypocrisy when it is seething out everywhere?
I have not selected a candidate to support, although I am leaning toward Cruz.
Trump’s BUSINESS bankruptcies (he never had personal ones) were Chapter 11. That is a restructure, not a walkaway.
Duh. Businesses he controlled made promises that were not kept.
And tell me what your dear leaning to boy Cruz did about the Iran deal.
And if you pick someone who leaves too bad a taste in America’s mouth, America sits out and we get the Democrat.
Hurrah for you.
You tried to equate Chapter 11 to a complete abandonment of a quest to reform immigration. How about YOU check YOURSELF for inapt comparisons.
If you would elect a President who would lie willfully then you're right there with Xero's athletic supporters.
Trump would not have to line item veto anything.
There is a difference between running a State and a corporation. With a State, the legislature has specified how the budget is assembled and the latitude the executive has to hire or fire. Under a civil service system, Walker was bound to accept the budget requests assembled by his Democrat enemies in those agencies. The line veto is his only realistic option until those people can be replaced. If you expect Trump to be able to turn over the entire Federal bureaucracy you will be sadly disappointed.
There is no Federal line item veto.
It is pertinent to look at this view of things.
No, it's not.
The Corker vote and the TPA are my two reasons not to support him fully.
Oh boy! The RINO war cry of "He can win!"
You've really stepped up to the level of gutless weasel there. Did you support Arnold too?
No wonder Hillary is making a central plank of her platform changing the Constitution to allow her to make it a crime to be critical of her.The link is to a discussion of Campaign Finance “Reform.” The discussion of Citizen’s United depends on a distinction between electronic (TV, Cable) and paper-and-ink idea propagation. The central fallacy is that “the Constitution didn’t discuss any technology other than the printing press.” But that is a naively literal reading:
It is not true that the Constitution is reactionary; the Constitution anticipates and forwards progress. TV, Cable - actually, all electronic communication technology, including the internet - is simply the playing out of the logic of the Constitution itself.
- Article 1 Section 8. :
- The Congress shall have power . . . To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries . . .
does not establish a ceiling over the rights of the people. Rather, as
- Amendment 1:
- Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
makes plain, the First Amendment is to be understood only as a floor under our right to express ourselves. Money is not speech, but it is undeniable that nobody can have freedom of the press if he cannot freely spend his own money on ink, paper, printing presses, and any other technological means which reflects “the progress of science and useful arts” applied to the problems which the literal printing press address.
- Amendment 9 :
- The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
"Campaign Finance Reform” is an abuse of our rights, and should be challenged in court. There is at present a 5-4 majority on SCOTUS to uphold the truth. It is a disgrace that any “CFR” law was ever passed, let alone been upheld in the courts. If there is a real requirement for reform, Article V is the answer - not for the people, but for the government to undertake.
By mentioning Arnold you have proven you have lost it.
Excellent article.
Trump shared the budget as it was presented to Walker. Walker had the right to protest that this was not FAIR, but technically it was not a LIE.
I give condolences to you about Walker’s quitting. I’d have thought he would make mincemeat out of Trump if things are as alleged.
You still don’t get the point, which is that if Trump was in Walker’s position, Trump might have not needed a line item veto. Of course that does not carry over directly to the presidency (no line item veto) but it carries over to other budget negotiation processes. If you can mix and match apples and oranges, well so can I.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.