Posted on 09/17/2015 3:40:39 PM PDT by ground_fog
ROFL ROFL
Here’s a link to the replay....
Full Speech: Donald Trump Speaks To Voters At Town Hall In Rochester, NH (9-17-15)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjJk5ZxpZXk
Well you can believe whatever you want then. I have a decent idea of this guys thinking, and that he isn’t a person that doesn’t like to go into situations weak nor leave as the loser.
Sorry if i can’t hotlink a 1000 page PDF, but I know when someone demands a detailed step by step of the plan for Putin, it usually mean that there isn’t anything to tell you that will convince you one way or the other.
Be sure to ask Scott Walker what he will do. Maybe he will give you a foreign policy white paper.
Oh, she knows all these people so well already, she's flown all over and met everyone and now they're like cousins.
"You know, it's hard to generalize, but you're going to have to look at the individual people, see how they've done, see how productive they've been, see what their references are, and then make a decision," Trump said.
And then in 2012 Trump told Newsmax that Romney was too harsh on immigration and hurt the Republican Party:
"He had a crazy policy of self-deportation, which was maniacal," Trump told Newsmax. "It sounded as bad as it was, and he lost all of the Latino vote." Trump added that the GOP should develop better policies "with respect to people wanting to be wonderful, productive citizens of this country."
I'm ignorant? It sounds like you don't have a clue about what Trump has actually said. You pick and choose the stuff you like and overlook or paper over all the contradictions, evolutions, etc, that Trump goes through to arrive at his various current positions (subject to change when it is expedient for him). No sir, it seems to me that you are being intentionally ignorant - something you have in common with many other Trumpsters who seem to think he is some cult hero that can do no wrong.
By the way, self deportation simply meant using eVerify and making sure illegals couldn't get work because businesses that employed them would face stiff penalties. A much simpler solution than pretty much any other.
That is not the end all be all of qualifications to be President. George Soros is uber rich and doesn't like to lose either - and he rarely does. Does that mean we want him as President? There are lots of rich leftist billionaires who rarely lose in business, does that make them presidential material? Heck, as far as the left is concerned Obama isn't losing either - he's won 2 terms, gotten a lot of his liberal agenda through and with Obamacare has fundamentally changed the way Americans connect to government (in the Democrats favor ofcourse).
Trump's positions have changed, evolved, shifted so often it is impossible to keep up.
Is that you, Jeb? Or your usual Concern Troll is deeply concerned.
‘Splodey heads a ‘sploding! Hah!!!
I’d love it...we need to work out our differences with Russia and realize we have a common enemy.
Speaking of St Carly.
Daily Mail does their homework.
Somehow I had this impression of her. It oozes.
Ah shaddup and get used to it.
Yeah, for shady bidness.
I’m not sure this is a good idea for Trump to meet Putin. Seems like he would have more to lose than to gain. Wouldn’t people expect Trump to be stern with Putin? I do. It isn’t really Trump’s place yet to be meddling in foreign policy. Just doesn’t seem right to me.
Thanks for the link. I agree, I had this impression of her also.
“It isn’t really Trump’s place yet to be meddling in foreign policy.”
First, it didn’t stop Obama, and second, we have no foreign policy. However, it would only be a photo opportunity, and would possibly give Trump some street creds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.