Judge Who Jailed Kim Davis Also Ordered Opposition to Sodomites to be Re-Educated

Freedom Outpost ^ | 9/5/2015 | Tim Brown

[aimhigh]

They knew exactly where to pick this fight. I wonder now whether the clerk herself, a Democrat who has only very recently proclaimed herself as newly born again Christian, is just playing her part in the plot.

Upon learning her Democrat party affiliation, that was my first thought.

[Resettozero]

1. Why was this Kentucky clerk not fired for not performing her job rather than being imprisoned?

2. Why was the current President not jailed for not enforcing existing laws.

[Resettozero]

1. Why was this Kentucky clerk not fired for not performing her job rather than being imprisoned?

2. Why was the current President not jailed for not enforcing existing laws.

[chae]

She was elected to the position. the only option would be a recall election, and they can’t do that because she would probably win.

[sport]

That will get the job done too. FReepers only post copyrighted material on days that end in y. Otherwise they follow the posting rules.

[Resettozero]

She was elected to the position. the only option would be a recall election, and they can’t do that because she would probably win.

Who is this "they" of whom you speak? What happened to "we"?

Why is our current President not jailed for the same reason as Kim Davis has been: not enforcing the "laws"?

Somehow, your response is unhelpful in my getting past your status quo impasse which seems to be a passive acceptance of the wrong that is taking place in this matter of Kim Davis vis a vis our current President's non-enforcement of existing law.

[chae]

You asked why was she not fired. I explained why she was not fired, there would have to be a recall election for that to happen as she was elected not hired or appointed. Sorry you don’t consider that fact to be relevant.

[Cold Heat]

I have a question for you....

I cannot make any sense of your response here.

Just what comment are you responding to?

[Resettozero]

Sorry you don’t consider that fact to be relevant.

Sokay. No need to feel bad about it; I don't.

[Resettozero]

Just what comment are you responding to?

My comments were posted in response to the thick-headed and incorrect responses (and lack of responses) to my two questions posed in my post #13, this thread.

(I cannot keep up either half the time; correctly grasping what a person means on any given FR post can be as exciting as winning the big lottery. It doesn't often happen; it's like not all of us here speak the same language.)

[Resettozero]

My post 43...not 13 this thread.

[rockinqsranch]

“....a person’s sexuality cannot be changed.”

“This is false.
Reference: Mayor DeBlasio’s wife, etc.”

Married to DeBlasio does not mean by any means she isn’t still a Lesbian, only that she married a male perhaps out of convenience for a purpose such as is apparent with the Clintons.

Marriage unfortunately doesn’t mean love to many who marry for other calculations. Some women with illegitimate children marry to have a father for the child for instance.

[Cold Heat]

Well....ok.....

But I did look at post thirteen, and it is a comment about Jim Bunning, the baseball pitcher....and not related to any of you posts..

[Resettozero]

My apology is extended to you. Typo should have been post 43. Please forgive my mistake. Thank you.

[Cold Heat]

Methinks you are transposing threads, this happens when you have multiple windows open. I’ve done my self a time or two.

That poster you replied to, did not make the post you commented on, and that post is not on this thread.

[Resettozero]

Apology for unintentionally bringing confusion into your day. Try my post 43?

[Cold Heat]

OK....so it’s the author of the piece and you are just being rhetorical?

[Cold Heat]

Well, I have to run....just thought I was loosing my mind for a bit....

[Resettozero]

OK....so it’s the author of the piece and you are just being rhetorical?

Cold Heat, you and I are communicating poorly today because of MY mistake of typing "post 13" instead of the correct number "post 43".

Let's try another time?

[Cold Heat]

You said you were replying to 13, now you say it’s 43.

43 is your own post.